Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2007 Aug 2:7:123.
doi: 10.1186/1472-6963-7-123.

Using system dynamics for collaborative design: a case study

Affiliations

Using system dynamics for collaborative design: a case study

Marie Elf et al. BMC Health Serv Res. .

Abstract

Background: In order to facilitate the collaborative design, system dynamics (SD) with a group modelling approach was used in the early stages of planning a new stroke unit. During six workshops a SD model was created in a multiprofessional group.

Aim: To explore to which extent and how the use of system dynamics contributed to the collaborative design process.

Method: A case study was conducted using several data sources.

Results: SD supported a collaborative design, by facilitating an explicit description of stroke care process, a dialogue and a joint understanding. The construction of the model obliged the group to conceptualise the stroke care and experimentation with the model gave the opportunity to reflect on care.

Conclusion: SD facilitated the collaborative design process and should be integrated in the early stages of the design process as a quality improvement tool.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
(a) Causal loops diagram (b) Stock and flow diagram.
Figure 2
Figure 2
The research process.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Examples of scenarios created at the experimentation workshop. The parameters in the model could be altered from 0 (very poor quality) - 1 (very good quality).
Figure 4
Figure 4
Outcomes from the scenarios.
Figure 5
Figure 5
A CLD of stroke care.

References

    1. Sloan-Devlin A, Arneill AB. Health care environments and patient outcomes: a review of the literature. Environment and behavior. 2003;35:665–94. doi: 10.1177/0013916503255102. - DOI
    1. Ulrich R, Zimring C. The Role of the Physical Environment in the Hospital of the 21st Century: A Once-in-a-Lifetime Opportunity. Center for Health Systems and Design, College of Architecture, Texas A & M and College of Architecture, Georgia Institute of Technology. 2004.
    1. Braddock CH, Edwards KA, Hasenberg NM, Laidley TL, Levinson W. Informed decision making in outpatient practice: time to get back to basics. JAMIA. 1999;282:2313–20. doi: 10.1001/jama.282.24.2313. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Kaplan B, Brennan PF. Consumer informatics supporting patients as co-producers of quality. JAMIA. 2001;8:309–16. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Towle A, Godolphin W. Framework for teaching and learning informed shared decision making... including commentary by Greenhalgh, T and Gambrill, J. BMJ. 1999;319:766–71. - PMC - PubMed

Publication types