Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2007 Aug 3:7:192.
doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-7-192.

Influence of maternal and social factors as predictors of low birth weight in Italy

Affiliations

Influence of maternal and social factors as predictors of low birth weight in Italy

Carmelo G A Nobile et al. BMC Public Health. .

Abstract

Background: The purpose of this study is to provide insight into the determinants of low birth weight (LBW) in Italy.

Methods: The study was carried out in a non-teaching hospital in Catanzaro (Italy). All LBW and very LBW newborns (200) were included in the study and a random sample of 400 newborns weighing > or = 2500 g was selected. Data were collected from the delivery certificates during one year. Smoking activity of mother and familiar and/or social support during pregnancy was gathered through telephone interviews.

Results: Overall annual LBW rate was 11.8%. Among LBW newborn there were 125 preterm and 75 term. Younger mothers, those who smoked during pregnancy, and had fewer prenatal care visits were more likely to deliver a LBW child; moreover, preterm newborns, delivered by caesarean section, and twin or multiple birth were significantly more likely to have a LBW. The comparison of very LBW (<1500 g) to LBW newborns showed that a very LBW was significantly more likely in newborns delivered by less educated mothers, those who work outside the home, live in smaller towns, and had less echographies; moreover, as expected, very LBW newborns were more likely to be preterm.

Conclusion: Several modifiable factors affect the risk of LBW, even when universal access to health care is freely available, but socio-economic status appears to correlate only to very LBW.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. The Scottish Low Birthweight Study Group The Scottish low birthweight study: I Survival, growth, neuromotor and sensory impairment. Arch Dis Child. 1992;67:675–81. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Phoroah PO, Stevenson CJ, Cooke RW, Stevenson RC. Clinical and subclinical deficits at 8 years in a geographically defined cohort of low birthweight infants. Arch Dis Child. 1994;70:264–70. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Strauss RS. Adult functional outcome of those born small for gestational age: twenty-six year follow-up of the 1970. JAMA. 2000;283:625–32. doi: 10.1001/jama.283.5.625. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Huxley RR, Shiell AW, Law CM. The role of size at birth and postnatal catch-up growth in determining systolic blood pressure: a systematic review of the literature. J Hypertens. 2000;18:815–31. doi: 10.1097/00004872-200018070-00002. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Lithell HO, McKeigue PM, Berglund L, Mohsen R, Lithell UB, Leon DA. Relation of size at birth to non-insulin dependent diabetes and insulin concentrations in men aged 50–60 years. BMJ. 1996;312:406–10. - PMC - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources