Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Randomized Controlled Trial
. 2007 May-Jun;73(3):370-7.
doi: 10.1016/s1808-8694(15)30081-1.

The efficacy of open molds in controlling tinnitus

Affiliations
Randomized Controlled Trial

The efficacy of open molds in controlling tinnitus

Gisele Munhoes dos Santos Ferrari et al. Braz J Otorhinolaryngol. 2007 May-Jun.

Abstract

Hearing aids may be a option to improve tinnitus and hearing loss.

Aim: to evaluate tinnitus after one month use of BTE hearing aids with open molds and pressure vent molds in patients with symmetric sensorineural hearing loss.

Methods: 50 patients seen at our Tinnitus Clinic who presented bilateral tinnitus and hearing loss underwent a randomized blind crossover clinical trial: 26 first used BTE hearing aids with open molds, and the remaining 24 first used pressure vent molds. After 30 days using the first mold and a wash-out period, the type of earmold was changed and was applied for another 30-day-period. Tinnitus evaluation was done qualitatively (improved, unchanged and worsened) and quantitatively (variation on a numeric scale from 0 to 10).

Results: 82% of the cases reported improvement of tinnitus with at least one type of earmold; there was no significant difference in the reduction of discomfort due to tinnitus in the quantitative and qualitative evaluations. Although similar tinnitus control was obtained with both methods, 66% of the patients preferred the open mold.

Conclusion: In a short-term evaluation improvement of tinnitus by the use of hearing aids does not depend on earmold ventilation.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Sequence of procedures done in each patient.
Chart 1
Chart 1
Correlation between measurements of variation of annoyance due to tinnitus and hearing loss assessed by a NS.

References

    1. Fowler EP. Head noises in normal and in normal and disordered ears: significance, measurement, differentiation and treatment. Arch Otolaryngol. 1944;39:498.
    1. Reed GF. An audiometric study of two hundred cases of subjective tinnitus. Arch Otolaryngol. 1960;71:74–84. - PubMed
    1. Shea JJ, Emmett JR. The medical treatment of tinnitus. J Laryngol Otol Suppl. 1981;4:130–138. - PubMed
    1. Antonelli A, Bellotto R, Grandor I.F. Audiologic Diagnosis of central versus eighth nerve and cochlear auditory impairment. Audiology. 1987;26:209–226. - PubMed
    1. Barnea G, Attias J, Gold S, Shahar A. Tinnitus with normal hearing sensitivity: extended high-frequency audiometry and auditory-nerve brain-stem-evoked responses. Audiology. 1990;29:36–45. - PubMed

Uncited Reference

    1. Von Wedel H, Strahlmann U, Zorowka P. Effectiveness of various non-medicinal therapeutic measures in tinnitus. A long-term study. Laryngorhinootologie. 1989;68(5):259–266. - PubMed
    1. Jastreboff PJ, Gray WC, Gold SL. Neurophisiological approach to tinnitus patients. Am J Otol. 1996;17:236–240. - PubMed

Publication types