Economic policies for tobacco control in developing countries
- PMID: 17684673
- DOI: 10.1590/s0036-36342006000700014
Economic policies for tobacco control in developing countries
Abstract
Raising tobacco taxes can have an income distributional impact on the population. Since lower socio-economic groups usually smoke more, they also contribute more to total cigarette tax collection. Thus, those who can afford it least contribute the most in terms of tobacco taxes. This means that tobacco taxes are regressive. However, tobacco tax increases are likely to be progressive, decreasing the relative tax incidence on the poor, vis-à-vis the rich. This is based on the premise that the poor are likely to be more sensitive to price changes, and would thus reduce their cigarette consumption by a greater percentage than the rich in response to an excise tax-induced increase in cigarette prices. Recent empirical studies confirm this hypothesis by demonstrating that the price responsiveness of cigarette demand increases with income. Research in China confirmed that reducing cigarette expenditures could release household resources for spending on food, housing, and other goods that improve living standards. Therefore, in the long run, tobacco control measures will reduce social inequality.
Similar articles
-
Are lower income smokers more price sensitive?: the evidence from Korean cigarette tax increases.Tob Control. 2016 Mar;25(2):141-6. doi: 10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2014-051680. Epub 2014 Nov 27. Tob Control. 2016. PMID: 25430738
-
Who pays the most cigarette tax in Turkey.Tob Control. 2016 Jan;25(1):39-45. doi: 10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2014-051639. Epub 2014 Sep 16. Tob Control. 2016. PMID: 25228361
-
Income and cigarette price responsiveness: evidence from Vietnam.Tob Control. 2022 Sep;31(Suppl 2):s152-s157. doi: 10.1136/tc-2022-057584. Epub 2022 Aug 17. Tob Control. 2022. PMID: 35977821
-
Price and tax measures and illicit trade in the framework convention on tobacco control: what we know and what research is required.Nicotine Tob Res. 2013 Apr;15(4):767-76. doi: 10.1093/ntr/nts170. Epub 2012 Sep 17. Nicotine Tob Res. 2013. PMID: 22987785 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Poor smokers, poor quitters, and cigarette tax regressivity.Am J Public Health. 2004 Feb;94(2):225-9. doi: 10.2105/ajph.94.2.225. Am J Public Health. 2004. PMID: 14759931 Free PMC article. Review.
Cited by
-
Tobacco use among married women in Nepal: the role of women's empowerment.Matern Child Health J. 2013 Apr;17(3):530-8. doi: 10.1007/s10995-012-1027-6. Matern Child Health J. 2013. PMID: 22527772
-
The effect of price on cigarette consumption, distribution, and sale in Tehran: a qualitative study.BMC Public Health. 2021 Sep 22;21(1):1720. doi: 10.1186/s12889-021-11733-5. BMC Public Health. 2021. PMID: 34551764 Free PMC article.
-
Questioning the regressivity of tobacco taxes: a distributional accounting impact model of increased tobacco taxation.Tob Control. 2021 May;30(3):245-257. doi: 10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2019-055315. Epub 2020 Jun 23. Tob Control. 2021. PMID: 32576701 Free PMC article.
-
Prenatal tobacco prevention and cessation interventions for women in low- and middle-income countries.Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2010;89(4):442-453. doi: 10.3109/00016341003678450. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2010. PMID: 20235895 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Analysis of Tobacco Price Elasticity in Albania Using Household Level Data.Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Jan 9;17(2):432. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17020432. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020. PMID: 31936433 Free PMC article.