Inter-individual variability in the capacity for motor recovery after ischemic stroke
- PMID: 17687024
- DOI: 10.1177/1545968307305302
Inter-individual variability in the capacity for motor recovery after ischemic stroke
Abstract
Background: Motor recovery after stroke is predicted only moderately by clinical variables, implying that there is still a substantial amount of unexplained, biologically meaningful variability in recovery. Regression diagnostics can indicate whether this is associated simply with Gaussian error or instead with multiple subpopulations that vary in their relationships to the clinical variables.
Objective: To perform regression diagnostics on a linear model for recovery versus clinical predictors.
Methods: Forty-one patients with ischemic stroke were studied. Impairment was assessed using the upper extremity Fugl-Meyer Motor Score. Motor recovery was defined as the change in the upper extremity Fugl-Meyer Motor Score from 24 to 72 hours after stroke to 3 or 6 months later. The clinical predictors in the model were age, gender, infarct location (subcortical vs cortical), diffusion weighted imaging infarct volume, time to reassessment, and acute upper extremity Fugl-Meyer Motor Score. Regression diagnostics included a Kolmogorov-Smirnov test for Gaussian errors and a test for outliers using Studentized deleted residuals.
Results: In the random sample, clinical variables explained only 47% of the variance in recovery. Among the patients with the most severe initial impairment, there was a set of regression outliers who recovered very poorly. With the outliers removed, explained variance in recovery increased to 89%, and recovery was well approximated by a proportional relationship with initial impairment (recovery congruent with 0.70 x initial impairment).
Conclusions: Clinical variables only moderately predict motor recovery. Regression diagnostics demonstrated the existence of a subpopulation of outliers with severe initial impairment who show little recovery. When these outliers were removed, clinical variables were good predictors of recovery among the remaining patients, showing a tight proportional relationship to initial impairment.
Similar articles
-
Early Fiber Number Ratio Is a Surrogate of Corticospinal Tract Integrity and Predicts Motor Recovery After Stroke.Stroke. 2016 Apr;47(4):1053-9. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.115.011576. Epub 2016 Mar 15. Stroke. 2016. PMID: 26979863
-
Generalizability of the Proportional Recovery Model for the Upper Extremity After an Ischemic Stroke.Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2015 Aug;29(7):614-22. doi: 10.1177/1545968314562115. Epub 2014 Dec 11. Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2015. PMID: 25505223
-
Revisiting the Proportional Recovery Model in View of the Ceiling Effect of Fugl-Meyer Assessment.Stroke. 2021 Oct;52(10):3167-3175. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.120.032409. Epub 2021 Jun 17. Stroke. 2021. PMID: 34134508
-
Prediction of recovery of motor function after stroke.Lancet Neurol. 2010 Dec;9(12):1228-1232. doi: 10.1016/S1474-4422(10)70247-7. Epub 2010 Oct 27. Lancet Neurol. 2010. PMID: 21035399 Review.
-
Effect of brain-computer interface training based on non-invasive electroencephalography using motor imagery on functional recovery after stroke - a systematic review and meta-analysis.BMC Neurol. 2020 Oct 22;20(1):385. doi: 10.1186/s12883-020-01960-5. BMC Neurol. 2020. PMID: 33092554 Free PMC article.
Cited by
-
Motor Learning in Stroke: Trained Patients Are Not Equal to Untrained Patients With Less Impairment.Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2017 Feb;31(2):178-189. doi: 10.1177/1545968316675432. Epub 2016 Oct 28. Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2017. PMID: 27789762 Free PMC article.
-
A large, open source dataset of stroke anatomical brain images and manual lesion segmentations.Sci Data. 2018 Feb 20;5:180011. doi: 10.1038/sdata.2018.11. Sci Data. 2018. PMID: 29461514 Free PMC article.
-
The Association Between Reorganization of Bilateral M1 Topography and Function in Response to Early Intensive Hand Focused Upper Limb Rehabilitation Following Stroke Is Dependent on Ipsilesional Corticospinal Tract Integrity.Front Neurol. 2019 Mar 26;10:258. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2019.00258. eCollection 2019. Front Neurol. 2019. PMID: 30972004 Free PMC article.
-
Rehabilitation robots for the treatment of sensorimotor deficits: a neurophysiological perspective.J Neuroeng Rehabil. 2018 Jun 5;15(1):46. doi: 10.1186/s12984-018-0383-x. J Neuroeng Rehabil. 2018. PMID: 29866106 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Position-Cortical Coherence as a Marker of Afferent Pathway Integrity Early Poststroke: A Prospective Cohort Study.Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2020 Apr;34(4):344-359. doi: 10.1177/1545968319893289. Epub 2020 Mar 4. Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2020. PMID: 32129142 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical