Historical and ecological determinants of genetic structure in arctic canids
- PMID: 17688546
- DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-294X.2007.03381.x
Historical and ecological determinants of genetic structure in arctic canids
Abstract
Wolves (Canis lupus) and arctic foxes (Alopex lagopus) are the only canid species found throughout the mainland tundra and arctic islands of North America. Contrasting evolutionary histories, and the contemporary ecology of each species, have combined to produce their divergent population genetic characteristics. Arctic foxes are more variable than wolves, and both island and mainland fox populations possess similarly high microsatellite variation. These differences result from larger effective population sizes in arctic foxes, and the fact that, unlike wolves, foxes were not isolated in discrete refugia during the Pleistocene. Despite the large physical distances and distinct ecotypes represented, a single, panmictic population of arctic foxes was found which spans the Svalbard Archipelago and the North American range of the species. This pattern likely reflects both the absence of historical population bottlenecks and current, high levels of gene flow following frequent long-distance foraging movements. In contrast, genetic structure in wolves correlates strongly to transitions in habitat type, and is probably determined by natal habitat-biased dispersal. Nonrandom dispersal may be cued by relative levels of vegetation cover between tundra and forest habitats, but especially by wolf prey specialization on ungulate species of familiar type and behaviour (sedentary or migratory). Results presented here suggest that, through its influence on sea ice, vegetation, prey dynamics and distribution, continued arctic climate change may have effects as dramatic as those of the Pleistocene on the genetic structure of arctic canid species.
Similar articles
-
Sea ice occurrence predicts genetic isolation in the Arctic fox.Mol Ecol. 2007 Oct;16(20):4241-55. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-294X.2007.03507.x. Epub 2007 Sep 14. Mol Ecol. 2007. PMID: 17868292
-
Ecological factors influence population genetic structure of European grey wolves.Mol Ecol. 2006 Dec;15(14):4533-53. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-294X.2006.03110.x. Mol Ecol. 2006. PMID: 17107481
-
Population structure in a critically endangered arctic fox population: does genetics matter?Mol Ecol. 2006 Sep;15(10):2809-19. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-294X.2006.02983.x. Mol Ecol. 2006. PMID: 16911202
-
Ecological change, range fluctuations and population dynamics during the Pleistocene.Curr Biol. 2009 Jul 28;19(14):R584-94. doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2009.06.030. Curr Biol. 2009. PMID: 19640497 Review.
-
The circumboreal tundra-taiga interface: late Pleistocene and Holocene changes.Ambio. 2002 Aug;Spec No 12:15-22. Ambio. 2002. PMID: 12374054 Review.
Cited by
-
Dietary differentiation and the evolution of population genetic structure in a highly mobile carnivore.PLoS One. 2012;7(6):e39341. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0039341. Epub 2012 Jun 29. PLoS One. 2012. PMID: 22768075 Free PMC article.
-
Diversity lost: are all Holarctic large mammal species just relict populations?BMC Biol. 2010 Apr 21;8:46. doi: 10.1186/1741-7007-8-46. BMC Biol. 2010. PMID: 20409351 Free PMC article.
-
Genomic signatures of extensive inbreeding in Isle Royale wolves, a population on the threshold of extinction.Sci Adv. 2019 May 29;5(5):eaau0757. doi: 10.1126/sciadv.aau0757. eCollection 2019 May. Sci Adv. 2019. PMID: 31149628 Free PMC article.
-
Population structure of two rabies hosts relative to the known distribution of rabies virus variants in Alaska.Mol Ecol. 2016 Feb;25(3):675-88. doi: 10.1111/mec.13509. Epub 2016 Jan 19. Mol Ecol. 2016. PMID: 26661691 Free PMC article.
-
Is black coat color in wolves of Iran an evidence of admixed ancestry with dogs?J Appl Genet. 2015 Feb;56(1):97-105. doi: 10.1007/s13353-014-0237-6. Epub 2014 Aug 2. J Appl Genet. 2015. PMID: 25085671
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources