Should we pursue patients who fail to attend colorectal clinics? A 9-year study
- PMID: 17688719
- PMCID: PMC2048594
- DOI: 10.1308/003588407X183319
Should we pursue patients who fail to attend colorectal clinics? A 9-year study
Abstract
Introduction: No uniform protocol exists on how to deal with patients who fail to attend colorectal clinics. Our aim was to identify whether the tendency to 'failure to attend' (FTA) in the colorectal clinic was associated with FTA in other clinics and also whether FTA patients have serious pathology.
Patients and methods: This was a retrospective study of a prospectively recorded list of FTA patients, in colorectal urgent or two-week wait clinics from 1996-2004.
Results: A total of 151 patients, who failed to attend their first appointment, were included in the study. Of these, 61 (40.4%) were colorectal referrals, 76 (50.3%) were general surgical referrals, and for 14 (9.3%) case notes were not available. There were 59 FTA episodes in 61 colorectal patients associated with 59 FTA episodes in other clinics (Pearson correlation: r = 0.411; P = 0.01, two-tailed, SPSS v.12). Of 58 colorectal outcomes, five (8.6%) colorectal cancers (CRC) were diagnosed, 23 (39.6%) were persistent non-attendees, 16 (27.5%) had benign colorectal pathology, two (3.4%) benign non-colorectal outcomes and 12 (20.6%) normal outcomes.
Conclusions: Tendency to FTA is habitual. Care needs to be exercised in the management of FTAs to avoid delayed presentation of colorectal cancer.
Figures
Similar articles
-
Same-day assessment and management of urgent (2-week wait) colorectal referrals: an analysis of the outcome of 1606 patients attending an endoscopy unit-based colorectal clinic.Colorectal Dis. 2014 May;16(5):O176-81. doi: 10.1111/codi.12508. Colorectal Dis. 2014. PMID: 24299144
-
Non-attendance at the colorectal clinic: a prospective audit.Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 2008 Jul;90(5):377-80. doi: 10.1308/003588408X301172. Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 2008. PMID: 18634730 Free PMC article.
-
Predictors of clinic non-attendance: opportunities to improve patient outcomes in colorectal cancer.Intern Med J. 2010 Nov;40(11):757-63. doi: 10.1111/j.1445-5994.2009.01986.x. Intern Med J. 2010. PMID: 19460064
-
Repeat 2-week wait referrals for colorectal cancer.Colorectal Dis. 2013 Mar;15(3):292-7. doi: 10.1111/j.1463-1318.2012.03173.x. Colorectal Dis. 2013. PMID: 22776207
-
Inter general practice variability in use of referral guidelines for colorectal cancer.Colorectal Dis. 2007 Oct;9(8):731-5. doi: 10.1111/j.1463-1318.2006.01201.x. Colorectal Dis. 2007. PMID: 17854292
References
-
- Department of Health. Referral Guidelines for Suspected Cancer. London: Department of Health; 2000.
-
- Government Statistical Service. Publication of latest statistics on activity in consultant led outpatient clinics, England, quarter ending 31 December 2002. London: Department of Health; 2003.
-
- Collins J, Santamaria N, Clayton L. Why outpatients fail to attend their scheduled appointments: a prospective comparison of differences between attenders and non-attenders. Aust Health Rev. 2003;26:52–63. - PubMed
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical