Difference between 2 measurement methods of version angles of the acetabular component
- PMID: 17689782
- DOI: 10.1016/j.arth.2006.07.011
Difference between 2 measurement methods of version angles of the acetabular component
Abstract
We evaluated the relationship and the difference between measurements of version angles (VAs) of the acetabular components in total hip arthroplasty taken using 2 different methods. One VA was measured on an anteroposterior radiograph of the hip joint (VAP) and the other on a cross-table lateral radiograph (VCL) in 97 hips after surgery (clinical data) and 6 sawbone pelvic models (model data). There was a positive correlation between VAP and VCL for both data. Mean and standard deviation of the differences (VCL - VAP) between the 2 measurements were 5 degrees +/- 4.2 degrees in clinical data and -0.01 degrees +/- 0.32 degrees in model data. These differences on clinical data should be taken into consideration when comparing VAs in the literature using different measuring methods.
Similar articles
-
Accuracy and precision of version angle measurements of the acetabular component after total hip arthroplasty.J Arthroplasty. 2013 Oct;28(9):1644-7. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2013.02.014. Epub 2013 Apr 6. J Arthroplasty. 2013. PMID: 23566697
-
Measurements of acetabular cup position and pelvic spatial orientation after total hip arthroplasty using computed tomography/radiography matching.Comput Aided Surg. 2005 Jan;10(1):37-43. doi: 10.3109/10929080500178032. Comput Aided Surg. 2005. PMID: 16199380
-
Method to reduce variations of inclination angle of the acetabular component during mini-incision hip arthroplasty.J Orthop Sci. 2006 May;11(3):254-8. doi: 10.1007/s00776-006-1006-0. J Orthop Sci. 2006. PMID: 16721525
-
Reliability and Validity of Standing Lateral Radiograph Method for Measuring Acetabular Component Version: A Modified Cross-table Lateral Radiograph Method.Orthop Surg. 2022 Aug;14(8):1622-1629. doi: 10.1111/os.13373. Epub 2022 Jun 16. Orthop Surg. 2022. PMID: 35711111 Free PMC article.
-
Measurements of pelvic flexion angle using three-dimensional computed tomography.Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2003 Jun;(411):140-51. doi: 10.1097/01.blo.0000069891.31220.fd. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2003. PMID: 12782869
Cited by
-
Accuracy of planar anteversion measurements using anteroposterior radiographs.BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2019 Dec 5;20(1):586. doi: 10.1186/s12891-019-2979-0. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2019. PMID: 31805912 Free PMC article.
-
CT outperforms radiography for determination of acetabular cup version after THA.Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2009 Sep;467(9):2362-70. doi: 10.1007/s11999-009-0774-1. Epub 2009 Mar 10. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2009. PMID: 19277802 Free PMC article.
-
How Reliable is the Acetabular Cup Position Assessment from Routine Radiographs?Iowa Orthop J. 2017;37:181-187. Iowa Orthop J. 2017. PMID: 28852355 Free PMC article.
-
Radiological assessment of cup anteversion with a novel 3D-printed highly-porous titanium dual mobility cup.J Orthop Surg Res. 2025 Feb 8;20(1):150. doi: 10.1186/s13018-025-05555-z. J Orthop Surg Res. 2025. PMID: 39920807 Free PMC article.
-
Anteroposterior Radiographs Are More Accurate than Cross-Table Lateral Radiographs for Acetabular Anteversion Assessment: a Retrospective Cohort Study.HSS J. 2016 Feb;12(1):32-8. doi: 10.1007/s11420-015-9472-6. Epub 2015 Oct 19. HSS J. 2016. PMID: 26855625 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Miscellaneous