Cathodal, anodal or bifocal stimulation of the motor cortex in the management of chronic pain?
- PMID: 17691290
- DOI: 10.1007/978-3-211-33081-4_7
Cathodal, anodal or bifocal stimulation of the motor cortex in the management of chronic pain?
Abstract
The conditions of motor cortex stimulation (MCS) applied with epidural electrodes, in particular monopolar (cathodal or anodal) and bipolar stimulation, are discussed. The results of theoretical studies, animal experiments and clinical studies lead to similar conclusions. Basically, cortical nerve fibres pointing at the epidural electrode and those normal to this direction are activated by anodal and cathodal stimulation, respectively. Because MCS for the relief of chronic pain is generally applied bipolarly with electrodes at a distance of at least 10 mm, stimulation may actually be bifocal. The polarity and magnitude of a stimulus needed to recruit cortical nerve fibres varies with the calibre and shape of the fibres, their distance from the electrode and their position in the folded cortex (gyri and sulci). A detailed analysis of intra-operative stimulation data suggests that in bipolar MCS the anode of the bipole giving the largest motor response in the pain region is generally the best electrode for pain management as well, when connected as a cathode. These electrode positions are most likely confined to area 4.
Similar articles
-
The role of intra-operative motor evoked potentials in the optimization of chronic cortical stimulation for the treatment of neuropathic pain.Clin Neurophysiol. 2007 Oct;118(10):2287-96. doi: 10.1016/j.clinph.2007.07.015. Epub 2007 Aug 31. Clin Neurophysiol. 2007. PMID: 17765605
-
Anodal vs cathodal stimulation of motor cortex: a modeling study.Clin Neurophysiol. 2007 Feb;118(2):464-74. doi: 10.1016/j.clinph.2006.09.012. Epub 2006 Dec 5. Clin Neurophysiol. 2007. PMID: 17150409
-
Modelling motor cortex stimulation for chronic pain control: electrical potential field, activating functions and responses of simple nerve fibre models.Med Biol Eng Comput. 2005 May;43(3):335-43. doi: 10.1007/BF02345810. Med Biol Eng Comput. 2005. PMID: 16035221
-
Central poststroke pain syndrome.Top Stroke Rehabil. 2010 May-Jun;17(3):163-72. doi: 10.1310/tsr1703-163. Top Stroke Rehabil. 2010. PMID: 20797959 Review.
-
Motor cortex stimulation: role of computer modeling.Acta Neurochir Suppl. 2007;97(Pt 2):497-503. doi: 10.1007/978-3-211-33081-4_57. Acta Neurochir Suppl. 2007. PMID: 17691340 Review.
Cited by
-
Top-Down Effect of Direct Current Stimulation on the Nociceptive Response of Rats.PLoS One. 2016 Apr 12;11(4):e0153506. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0153506. eCollection 2016. PLoS One. 2016. PMID: 27071073 Free PMC article.
-
Non-invasive Brain Stimulation, a Tool to Revert Maladaptive Plasticity in Neuropathic Pain.Front Hum Neurosci. 2016 Jul 27;10:376. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2016.00376. eCollection 2016. Front Hum Neurosci. 2016. PMID: 27512368 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Acute and repetitive fronto-cerebellar tDCS stimulation improves mood in non-depressed participants.Exp Brain Res. 2018 Jan;236(1):83-97. doi: 10.1007/s00221-017-5109-y. Epub 2017 Nov 2. Exp Brain Res. 2018. PMID: 29098314
-
Computational Study of Subdural Cortical Stimulation: Effects of Simulating Anisotropic Conductivity on Activation of Cortical Neurons.PLoS One. 2015 Jun 9;10(6):e0128590. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0128590. eCollection 2015. PLoS One. 2015. PMID: 26057524 Free PMC article.
-
Invasive brain stimulation for the treatment of neuropathic pain.Nat Rev Neurol. 2011 Sep 20;7(12):699-709. doi: 10.1038/nrneurol.2011.138. Nat Rev Neurol. 2011. PMID: 21931348 Review.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Medical