Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2007 Aug 10:7:204.
doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-7-204.

Covert observation in practice: lessons from the evaluation of the prohibition of smoking in public places in Scotland

Affiliations

Covert observation in practice: lessons from the evaluation of the prohibition of smoking in public places in Scotland

Mark Petticrew et al. BMC Public Health. .

Abstract

Background: A ban on smoking in wholly or substantially enclosed public places has been in place in Scotland since 26th March 2006. The impact of this legislation is currently being evaluated in seven studies, three of which involve direct observation of smoking in bars and other enclosed public places. While the ethical issues around covert observation have been widely discussed there is little practical guidance on the conduct of such research. A workshop was therefore convened to identify practical lessons learned so far from the Scottish evaluation.

Methods: We convened a workshop involving researchers from the three studies which used direct observation. In addition, one of the fieldwork managers collected written feedback on the fieldwork, identifying problems that arose in the field and some solutions.

Results: There were four main themes identified: (i) the difficulty of achieving and maintaining concealment; (ii) the experience of being an observer; (iii) the risk of bias in the observations and (iv) issues around training and recruitment. These are discussed.

Conclusion: Collecting covert observational data poses unique practical challenges, in particular in relation to the health and safety of the researcher. The findings and solutions presented in this paper will be of value to researchers designing similar studies.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Lugosi P. Between overt and covert research. Concealment and disclosure in an ethnographic study of commercial hospitalit. Qual Inq. 2006;12:541–561. doi: 10.1177/1077800405282801. - DOI
    1. Mayo E. The human problems of an industrial civilization. New York, MacMillan; 1933.
    1. Clifford P, Maisto S. Subject reactivity effects and alcohol treatment outcome research. J Stud Alcohol. 2000;61:787–793. - PubMed
    1. Klesges L, Baranowski T, Beech B, Cullen K, Murray D, Rochon J, Pratt C. Social desirability bias in self-reported dietary, physical activity and weight concerns measures in 8- to 10-year-old African-American girls: results from the Girls Health Enrichment Multisite Studies (GEMS) Prev Med. 2004;38:S78–87. doi: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2003.07.003. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Biglan M, Gilpin E, Rohrbach L, Pierce J. Is there a simple correction factor for comparing adolescent tobacco-use estimates from school- and home-based surveys? Nicotine Tob Res. 2004;6:427–437. doi: 10.1080/14622200410001696592. - DOI - PubMed

Publication types