Outcome of single-chamber, ventricular pacemakers with transvenous leads implanted in children
- PMID: 17693457
- DOI: 10.1093/europace/eum164
Outcome of single-chamber, ventricular pacemakers with transvenous leads implanted in children
Abstract
Aims: In children with bradyarrhythmias, ventricular demand, rate-responsive pacemakers (VVI/R PM) are often indicated, but no study is entirely dedicated to their outcome.
Methods and results: We evaluated the outcomes of children with VVI/R PM implanted at our centre, with a retrospective analysis. Between 1990 and 2005, 117 children (63 with congenital heart defects), received VVI/R PM with endocardial lead at 5.3 +/- 3.9 years of age for atrioventricular block (n = 105) and sinus node dysfunction. The majority of the leads were unipolar (n = 78), tined (n = 110), and steroid eluting (n = 89). The leads were fixed to subcutaneous tissues by absorbable suture in all patients; in 17 patients, also an atrial loop was created. Follow-up (FU) was 7.8 +/- 4.1 years. There were 22 system failures (19%), due to lead malfunction (n = 20) and system erosion/infection. The log-rank test for equality of survivor functions showed no significant risk factor. However, lead malfunction occurred only in the group without loop, but FU duration was longer in these patients. Complications at implantation were haemothorax (2.5%) and lead dislodgement (5%). Clinically silent occlusion of the subclavian vein was documented at FU by Echo-Doppler in 5%.
Conclusion: In this particular group of patients, VVI/R pacing has good results, but after long-term FU shows 19% of failures, mainly lead-related.
Similar articles
-
Twenty years of paediatric cardiac pacing: 515 pacemakers and 480 leads implanted in 292 patients.Europace. 2006 Jul;8(7):530-6. doi: 10.1093/europace/eul062. Europace. 2006. PMID: 16798767
-
Single-centre experience on endocardial and epicardial pacemaker system function in neonates and infants.Europace. 2007 Jun;9(6):426-31. doi: 10.1093/europace/eum043. Epub 2007 Apr 24. Europace. 2007. PMID: 17456533
-
Left heart atrial and ventricular epicardial pacing through a left lateral thoracotomy in children: a safe approach with excellent functional and cosmetic results.Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2005 Oct;28(4):541-5. doi: 10.1016/j.ejcts.2005.06.040. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2005. PMID: 16125947
-
Efficacy of prophylactic epicardial pacing leads in children and young adults.Ann Thorac Surg. 2004 Jul;78(1):197-202; discussion 202-3. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2004.02.008. Ann Thorac Surg. 2004. PMID: 15223427 Review.
-
Pacemaker and implantable cardioverter defibrillator implantation in pediatric patients.Minerva Cardioangiol. 2007 Dec;55(6):803-13. Minerva Cardioangiol. 2007. PMID: 18091647 Review.
Cited by
-
Lead Extraction in Children and Young Adults: When is the Best Time for Lead/System Replacement?Pediatr Cardiol. 2025 Jan;46(1):61-71. doi: 10.1007/s00246-023-03320-9. Epub 2023 Oct 28. Pediatr Cardiol. 2025. PMID: 37898588 Free PMC article.
-
Congenital and childhood atrioventricular blocks: pathophysiology and contemporary management.Eur J Pediatr. 2016 Sep;175(9):1235-1248. doi: 10.1007/s00431-016-2748-0. Epub 2016 Jun 28. Eur J Pediatr. 2016. PMID: 27351174 Free PMC article. Review.
-
New Guidelines of Pediatric Cardiac Implantable Electronic Devices: What Is Changing in Clinical Practice?J Cardiovasc Dev Dis. 2024 Mar 27;11(4):99. doi: 10.3390/jcdd11040099. J Cardiovasc Dev Dis. 2024. PMID: 38667717 Free PMC article. Review.
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical