Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2007 Aug;16(4):279-84.
doi: 10.1136/qshc.2006.019497.

The impact of a closed-loop electronic prescribing and administration system on prescribing errors, administration errors and staff time: a before-and-after study

Affiliations

The impact of a closed-loop electronic prescribing and administration system on prescribing errors, administration errors and staff time: a before-and-after study

Bryony Dean Franklin et al. Qual Saf Health Care. 2007 Aug.

Abstract

Objectives: To assess the impact of a closed-loop electronic prescribing, automated dispensing, barcode patient identification and electronic medication administration record (EMAR) system on prescribing and administration errors, confirmation of patient identity before administration, and staff time.

Design, setting and participants: Before-and-after study in a surgical ward of a teaching hospital, involving patients and staff of that ward.

Intervention: Closed-loop electronic prescribing, automated dispensing, barcode patient identification and EMAR system.

Main outcome measures: Percentage of new medication orders with a prescribing error, percentage of doses with medication administration errors (MAEs) and percentage given without checking patient identity. Time spent prescribing and providing a ward pharmacy service. Nursing time on medication tasks.

Results: Prescribing errors were identified in 3.8% of 2450 medication orders pre-intervention and 2.0% of 2353 orders afterwards (p<0.001; chi(2) test). MAEs occurred in 7.0% of 1473 non-intravenous doses pre-intervention and 4.3% of 1139 afterwards (p = 0.005; chi(2) test). Patient identity was not checked for 82.6% of 1344 doses pre-intervention and 18.9% of 1291 afterwards (p<0.001; chi(2) test). Medical staff required 15 s to prescribe a regular inpatient drug pre-intervention and 39 s afterwards (p = 0.03; t test). Time spent providing a ward pharmacy service increased from 68 min to 98 min each weekday (p = 0.001; t test); 22% of drug charts were unavailable pre-intervention. Time per drug administration round decreased from 50 min to 40 min (p = 0.006; t test); nursing time on medication tasks outside of drug rounds increased from 21.1% to 28.7% (p = 0.006; chi(2) test).

Conclusions: A closed-loop electronic prescribing, dispensing and barcode patient identification system reduced prescribing errors and MAEs, and increased confirmation of patient identity before administration. Time spent on medication-related tasks increased.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Competing interests: The authors' work was independent of MDG Medical.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Committee on Quality of Health Care in America, Institute of Medicine To err is human: building a safer health system. Washington, DC: National Academy Press, 2000
    1. Department of Health Building a safer NHS for patients: improving medication safety. London: Department of Health, 2004
    1. Audit Commission A spoonful of sugar—medicines management in NHS hospitals. London: Audit Commission, 2001
    1. Kaushal R, Bates D W. Information technology and medication safety: what is the benefit? Qual Saf Health Care 200211261–265. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Bates D W. Using information technology to reduce rates of medication errors in hospitals. BMJ 2000320788–791. - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms