An informatics benchmarking statement
- PMID: 17694230
- DOI: 10.1160/me0442
An informatics benchmarking statement
Abstract
Objectives: Benchmarking statements provide a mechanism for making academic standards explicit within a subject area. They allow comparisons between courses to be based on learning outcomes rather than by defining a curriculum. No such statement has been produced for informatics. In the absence of any established benchmarking statements for informatics a new biomedical informatics course at St. George's has developed a first benchmarking statement - which defines the skills knowledge and understanding a biomedical informatics student should acquire by the time they complete the course.
Methods: Review of national biomedical science and computing subject benchmarking statements and academic educational objectives and national occupational competencies in informatics.
Results: We have developed a twenty-item benchmarking statement and this is available on-line at: http://www.gpinformatics.org/benchmark2006/. This benchmarking statement includes a definition and justification for all twenty statements. We found international educational objectives and national informatics competencies useful and these are mapped to each one. National subject benchmarks for computing and biomedical science were less useful and have not been systematically mapped.
Conclusions: Benchmarking the skills, knowledge and understanding that a student should acquire during their course of study may be more useful than setting a standard curriculum. This benchmarking statement is a first step towards defining the learning outcomes and competencies a student of this discipline should acquire. The international informatics community should consider moving from a standard curriculum to an agreed subject benchmarking statement for medical, health and biomedical informatics.
Similar articles
-
Developing Harmonized Benchmarks for the Master of Science in Health Informatics for the East African Region.Stud Health Technol Inform. 2022 Jun 6;290:907-911. doi: 10.3233/SHTI220211. Stud Health Technol Inform. 2022. PMID: 35673150
-
Health and medical informatics competencies: call to participate in updating the IMIA recommendations.Methods Inf Med. 2002;41(2):86-8. Methods Inf Med. 2002. PMID: 12061128
-
Recommendations of the International Medical Informatics Association (IMIA) on education in health and medical informatics.Stud Health Technol Inform. 2004;109:226-43. Stud Health Technol Inform. 2004. PMID: 15718686
-
Bridging the gap between biological and clinical informatics in a graduate training program.J Biomed Inform. 2007 Feb;40(1):59-66. doi: 10.1016/j.jbi.2006.02.011. Epub 2006 Mar 15. J Biomed Inform. 2007. PMID: 16616697 Review.
-
Defining the boundaries of physiological understanding: the benchmarks curriculum model.Am J Physiol. 1998 Dec;275(6 Pt 2):S35-45. doi: 10.1152/advances.1998.275.6.S35. Am J Physiol. 1998. PMID: 16161224 Review.
Cited by
-
The health information technology workforce: estimations of demands and a framework for requirements.Appl Clin Inform. 2010 Jun 30;1(2):197-212. doi: 10.4338/ACI-2009-11-R-0011. Print 2010. Appl Clin Inform. 2010. PMID: 23616836 Free PMC article.
-
Research Strategies for Biomedical and Health Informatics. Some Thought-provoking and Critical Proposals to Encourage Scientific Debate on the Nature of Good Research in Medical Informatics.Methods Inf Med. 2017 Jan 25;56(S 01):e1-e10. doi: 10.3414/ME16-01-0125. Methods Inf Med. 2017. PMID: 28119991 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources