Predictions of psychophysical measurements for sinusoidal amplitude modulated (SAM) pulse-train stimuli from a stochastic model
- PMID: 17694859
- DOI: 10.1109/TBME.2007.900800
Predictions of psychophysical measurements for sinusoidal amplitude modulated (SAM) pulse-train stimuli from a stochastic model
Abstract
Two approaches have been proposed to reduce the synchrony of the neural response to electrical stimuli in cochlear implants. One approach involves adding noise to the pulse-train stimulus, and the other is based on using a high-rate pulse-train carrier. Hypotheses regarding the efficacy of the two approaches can be tested using computational models of neural responsiveness prior to time-intensive psychophysical studies. In our previous work, we have used such models to examine the effects of noise on several psychophysical measures important to speech recognition. However, to date there has been no parallel analytic solution investigating the neural response to the high-rate pulse-train stimuli and their effect on psychophysical measures. This work investigates the properties of the neural response to high-rate pulse-train stimuli with amplitude modulated envelopes using a stochastic auditory nerve model. The statistics governing the neural response to each pulse are derived using a recursive method. The agreement between the theoretical predictions and model simulations is demonstrated for sinusoidal amplitude modulated (SAM) high rate pulse-train stimuli. With our approach, predicting the neural response in modern implant devices becomes tractable. Psychophysical measurements are also predicted using the stochastic auditory nerve model for SAM high-rate pulse-train stimuli. Changes in dynamic range (DR) and intensity discrimination are compared with that observed for noise-modulated pulse-train stimuli. Modulation frequency discrimination is also studied as a function of stimulus level and pulse rate. Results suggest that high rate carriers may positively impact such psychophysical measures.
Similar articles
-
Predicting the threshold of pulse-train electrical stimuli using a stochastic auditory nerve model: the effects of stimulus noise.IEEE Trans Biomed Eng. 2004 Apr;51(4):590-603. doi: 10.1109/TBME.2004.824143. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng. 2004. PMID: 15072213
-
Predicting dynamic range and intensity discrimination for electrical pulse-train stimuli using a stochastic auditory nerve model: the effects of stimulus noise.IEEE Trans Biomed Eng. 2005 Jun;52(6):1040-9. doi: 10.1109/TBME.2005.846718. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng. 2005. PMID: 15977734
-
Neural response telemetry reconsidered: II. The influence of neural population on the ECAP recovery function and refractoriness.Ear Hear. 2010 Jun;31(3):380-91. doi: 10.1097/AUD.0b013e3181cb41aa. Ear Hear. 2010. PMID: 20090532
-
Statistical models for neural encoding, decoding, and optimal stimulus design.Prog Brain Res. 2007;165:493-507. doi: 10.1016/S0079-6123(06)65031-0. Prog Brain Res. 2007. PMID: 17925266 Review.
-
Optimizing stimulus waveforms for electroceuticals.Biol Cybern. 2019 Apr;113(1-2):191-199. doi: 10.1007/s00422-018-0774-x. Epub 2018 Aug 11. Biol Cybern. 2019. PMID: 30099589 Review.
Cited by
-
An Adaptive Leaky-Integrate and Firing Probability Model of an Electrically Stimulated Auditory Nerve Fiber.Trends Hear. 2024 Jan-Dec;28:23312165241286742. doi: 10.1177/23312165241286742. Trends Hear. 2024. PMID: 39497532 Free PMC article.
-
Encoding and decoding amplitude-modulated cochlear implant stimuli--a point process analysis.J Comput Neurosci. 2010 Jun;28(3):405-24. doi: 10.1007/s10827-010-0224-9. Epub 2010 Feb 23. J Comput Neurosci. 2010. PMID: 20177761 Free PMC article.
-
A point process framework for modeling electrical stimulation of the auditory nerve.J Neurophysiol. 2012 Sep;108(5):1430-52. doi: 10.1152/jn.00095.2012. Epub 2012 Jun 6. J Neurophysiol. 2012. PMID: 22673331 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources