Randomized, double-blind, comparative study of dexrabeprazole 10 mg versus rabeprazole 20 mg in the treatment of gastroesophageal reflux disease
- PMID: 17696229
- PMCID: PMC4205312
- DOI: 10.3748/wjg.v13.i30.4100
Randomized, double-blind, comparative study of dexrabeprazole 10 mg versus rabeprazole 20 mg in the treatment of gastroesophageal reflux disease
Abstract
Aim: To compare the efficacy and safety of dexrabeprazole 10 mg versus rabeprazole 20 mg in the treatment of gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD).
Methods: This was a randomized, double-blind clinical study. Fifty patients with GERD were randomly assigned to receive dexrabeprazole 10 mg or rabeprazole 20 mg once daily. Efficacy was assessed by evaluating improvement in visual analog scale (VAS) scores of heart-burn and regurgitation and safety was assessed by recording incidence of any adverse drug reactions. Laboratory investigations and upper gastro-intestinal endoscopy was conducted at baseline and after 28 d of therapy.
Results: A total of 50 patients (n = 25 in dexrabeprazole group and rabeprazole group each) completed the study. There were no significant differences in the baseline characteristics between the two groups. The VAS score (mean +/- SD) of heartburn and regurgitation in dexrabeprazole (64.8 +/- 5.1 and 64 +/- 8.1, respectively) and rabeprazole (64.4 +/- 8.7 and 57.6 +/- 9.7, respectively) groups significantly reduced (P < 0.0001) to 30 +/- 11.5, 24 +/- 10 and 32 +/- 9.5, 29.2 +/- 11.9, respectively on d 28. A significantly higher (P = 0.002) proportion of patients showed >or= 50% improvement in regurgitation with dexrabeprazole 10 mg (96%) compared to rabeprazole 20 mg (60%). Onset of symptom improvement was significantly earlier with dexrabeprazole than with rabeprazole (1.8 +/- 0.8 d vs 2.6 +/- 1.4 d; P < 0.05). The incidences of esophagitis in the dexrabeprazole group and rabeprazole group before therapy were 84% and 92%, respectively (P = 0.38). The incidence of improvement/healing of esophagitis after therapy was more (P = 0.036) in the dexrabeprazole group (95.2%) compared to the rabeprazole group (65.2%). No adverse drug reaction was seen in either group.
Conclusion: In the treatment of GERD, efficacy of dexrabeprazole 10 mg is better than rabeprazole 20 mg, with regards to improvement/healing of endoscopic lesions and relief from symptoms of regurgitation.
Comment in
-
Is the required therapeutic effect always achieved by racemic switch of proton-pump inhibitors?World J Gastroenterol. 2008 Apr 28;14(16):2617-9. doi: 10.3748/wjg.14.2617. World J Gastroenterol. 2008. PMID: 18442220 Free PMC article.
-
Ten mg dexrabeprazole daily is as effective as 20 mg rabeprazole daily.World J Gastroenterol. 2008 Jul 28;14(28):4586-7. doi: 10.3748/wjg.14.4586. World J Gastroenterol. 2008. PMID: 18680246 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
Similar articles
-
Ten mg dexrabeprazole daily is as effective as 20 mg rabeprazole daily.World J Gastroenterol. 2008 Jul 28;14(28):4586-7. doi: 10.3748/wjg.14.4586. World J Gastroenterol. 2008. PMID: 18680246 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
Comparative clinical trial of S-pantoprazole versus racemic pantoprazole in the treatment of gastro-esophageal reflux disease.World J Gastroenterol. 2006 Oct 7;12(37):6017-20. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v12.i37.6017. World J Gastroenterol. 2006. PMID: 17009401 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
A postmarketing surveillance study of dexrabeprazole in the treatment of acid peptic disorders.J Indian Med Assoc. 2009 Feb;107(2):111-3. J Indian Med Assoc. 2009. PMID: 19585824 Clinical Trial.
-
Onset of relief of symptoms of gastroesophageal reflux disease: post hoc analysis of two previously published studies comparing pantoprazole 20 mg once daily with nizatidine or ranitidine 150 mg twice daily.Clin Ther. 2010 Apr;32(4):678-90. doi: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2010.03.020. Clin Ther. 2010. PMID: 20435237 Review.
-
Rabeprazole-based therapy in the management of symptomatic gastroesophageal reflux disease.Am J Gastroenterol. 2003 Mar;98(3 Suppl):S49-55. doi: 10.1016/s0002-9270(03)00015-7. Am J Gastroenterol. 2003. PMID: 12644031 Review.
Cited by
-
Efficacy of S-pantoprazole 20 mg compared with pantoprazole 40 mg in the treatment of reflux esophagitis: a randomized, double-blind comparative trial.Dig Dis Sci. 2012 Dec;57(12):3189-94. doi: 10.1007/s10620-012-2297-y. Epub 2012 Jul 8. Dig Dis Sci. 2012. PMID: 22772870 Clinical Trial.
-
Efficacy of S-pantoprazole 10 mg in the Symptom Control of Non-erosive Reflux Disease: A Phase III Placebo-controlled Trial.J Neurogastroenterol Motil. 2021 Apr 30;27(2):223-230. doi: 10.5056/jnm19053. J Neurogastroenterol Motil. 2021. PMID: 33795542 Free PMC article.
-
Enantioselective Binding of Proton Pump Inhibitors to Alpha1-Acid Glycoprotein and Human Serum Albumin-A Chromatographic, Spectroscopic, and In Silico Study.Int J Mol Sci. 2024 Oct 1;25(19):10575. doi: 10.3390/ijms251910575. Int J Mol Sci. 2024. PMID: 39408903 Free PMC article.
-
Essential oils from tropical medicinal herbs and food plants inhibit biofilm formation in vitro and are non-cytotoxic to human cells.3 Biotech. 2018 Sep;8(9):395. doi: 10.1007/s13205-018-1413-x. Epub 2018 Sep 1. 3 Biotech. 2018. PMID: 30221108 Free PMC article.
-
Is the required therapeutic effect always achieved by racemic switch of proton-pump inhibitors?World J Gastroenterol. 2008 Apr 28;14(16):2617-9. doi: 10.3748/wjg.14.2617. World J Gastroenterol. 2008. PMID: 18442220 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Bodhankar SL, Jain BB, Ahire BP, Daude RB, Shitole PP. The effect of rabeprazole and its isomers on histamine and aspirin induced ulcers in rats. Indian J Pharmacol. 2006;38:357–358.
-
- Guyatt GH, Townsend M, Berman LB, Keller JL. A comparison of Likert and visual analogue scales for measuring change in function. J Chronic Dis. 1987;40:1129–1133. - PubMed
-
- Pai V, Pai N. Recent Developments: Chiral switch in PPI therapy: S (-) Pantoprazole. Br Med J-South Asia Edition. 2006;22:112.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical