Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2007 Aug 14;13(30):4136-40.
doi: 10.3748/wjg.v13.i30.4136.

Effects of nutritional and psychological status in gastrointestinal cancer patients on tolerance of treatment

Affiliations

Effects of nutritional and psychological status in gastrointestinal cancer patients on tolerance of treatment

Jun Tian et al. World J Gastroenterol. .

Abstract

Aim: To assess the effects of poor nutritional and psychological status on tolerance of cancer treatment and the recovery of physical performance status in patients with gastrointestinal cancer.

Methods: An epidemiological survey with respect to nutritional and psychological status in patients with gastrointestinal cancer was conducted among 182 operated patients in four provincial-level hospitals from December 2005 to June 2006. The food frequency survey method, state-trait anxiety inventory (STAI) and depression status inventory (DSI) were used to obtain information about the diet and psychological status in the patients. Nutritional status in the participants was reflected by serum albumin (Alb), hemoglobin (HB) and body mass index (BMI).

Results: Alb, protein intake and anxiety were associated with the severity of side effects of treatment. The adjusted relative risk (RR) for Alb, protein intake and anxiety was 3.30 (95% CI: 1.08, 10.10, P = 0.03), 3.25 (95% CI: 1.06, 9.90, P = 0.04) and 1.48 (95% CI: 1.29, 1.70, P < 0.0001), respectively. Moreover, calorie intake, HB and depression were associated with the recovery of physical performance status in the patients. Adjusted relative risk was 2.12 (95% CI: 1.09, 4.03, P = 0.028), 2.05 (95% CI: 1.08, 3.88, P = 0.026) and 1.07 (95% CI: 1.02, 1.12, P = 0.007), respectively.

Conclusion: Both poor nutrition status and psychological status are independent risk factors for severe side effects of cancer treatment, and have impact on the recovery of physical performance status in patients after treatment.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Tartarone A, Wunder J, Romano G, Ardito R, Iodice G, Mazzuoli S, Barone M, Matera R, Di Renzo N. Role of parenteral nutrition in cancer patients undergoing high-dose chemotherapy followed by autologous peripheral blood progenitor cell transplantation. Tumori. 2005;91:237–240. - PubMed
    1. Johansen N, Kondrup J, Plum LM, Bak L, Nørregaard P, Bunch E, Baernthsen H, Andersen JR, Larsen IH, Martinsen A. Effect of nutritional support on clinical outcome in patients at nutritional risk. Clin Nutr. 2004;23:539–550. - PubMed
    1. Van Cutsem E, Arends J. The causes and consequences of cancer-associated malnutrition. Eur J Oncol Nurs. 2005;9 Suppl 2:S51–S63. - PubMed
    1. Khan AU, Sheikh MU, Intekhab K. Pre-existing malnutrition and treatment outcome in children with acute lymphoblastic leukaemia. J Pak Med Assoc. 2006;56:171–173. - PubMed
    1. Read JA, Clarke SJ, Volker D. Nutritional and anti-inflammatory strategies in the treatment of advanced colorectal cancer - a pilot study. Asia Pac J Clin Nutr. 2004;13(Suppl):S93.

Publication types

MeSH terms