Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comparative Study
. 2007 Aug 14:7:206.
doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-7-206.

Expectations and changing attitudes of bar workers before and after the implementation of smoke-free legislation in Scotland

Affiliations
Comparative Study

Expectations and changing attitudes of bar workers before and after the implementation of smoke-free legislation in Scotland

Shona Hilton et al. BMC Public Health. .

Abstract

Background: In Scotland on March 26, 2006 a comprehensive prohibition on smoking in all enclosed public places was introduced. This study examines bar workers' attitudes towards a smoke-free working environment.

Methods: An intervention study comparing bar workers' opinions before and after the implementation of the smoke-free legislation. Bars were randomly selected in three Scottish cities (Glasgow, Edinburgh & Aberdeen) and towns (Aberdeenshire & Borders). Bar workers were recruited from 72 bars that agreed to participate from 159 approached. Pre- and post-implementation attitudes towards legislation, second-hand smoke and smoke-free working environments were compared.

Results: Initially the majority of bar workers agreed with the proposed legislation on smoking (69%) and the need for it to protect the health of workers (80%), although almost half (49%) thought the legislation would damage business. In 266 bar workers seen at both surveys, a significant positive attitudinal change towards the legislation was seen. Post-implementation, support for the legislation rose to 79%, bar workers continued to believe it was needed to protect health (81%) and concerns about the impact on business were expressed by fewer than 20%. Only the statement that the legislation would encourage smokers to quit showed reduced support, from 70% pre-implementation to fewer than 60% post-implementation. Initial acceptance was greater among younger bar workers; older workers, initially more sceptical, became less so with experience of the legislation's effects.

Conclusion: This study shows that bar workers had generally positive attitudes towards the legislation prior to implementation, which became stronger after implementation. The affirmative attitudes of these key stakeholders are likely to contribute towards the creation of 'smoke-free' as the new social norm.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. The Smoking, Health and Social Care (Scotland) Act 2005, Part 1. Edinburgh , The Stationary Office Ltd; 2005.
    1. Howard J. Smoking is an occupational hazard. American Journal of Independent Medicine. 2004;46:161–169. doi: 10.1002/ajim.10364. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Jamrozik K. Estimate of deaths attributable to passive smoking among UK adults: database analysis. The British Medical Journal. 2005;330:812–824. doi: 10.1136/bmj.38370.496632.8F. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Jarvis MJ. Quantitative survey of exposure to other people's smoke in London bar staff. London , SmokeFree; 2001.
    1. Allwright S, Paul G, Greiner B, Mullally BJ, Pursell L, Kelly A, Bonner B, D'Eath M, McConnell B, McLaughlin JP, O'Donovan D, O'Kane E, Perry IJ. Legislation for smoke-free workplaces and health of bar workers in Ireland: before and after study. BMJ. 2005;331:1117. doi: 10.1136/bmj.38636.499225.55. - DOI - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms

Substances