Birth after caesarean study--planned vaginal birth or planned elective repeat caesarean for women at term with a single previous caesarean birth: protocol for a patient preference study and randomised trial
- PMID: 17697343
- PMCID: PMC1988834
- DOI: 10.1186/1471-2393-7-17
Birth after caesarean study--planned vaginal birth or planned elective repeat caesarean for women at term with a single previous caesarean birth: protocol for a patient preference study and randomised trial
Abstract
Background: For women who have a caesarean section in their preceding pregnancy, two care policies for birth are considered standard: planned vaginal birth and planned elective repeat caesarean. Currently available information about the benefits and harms of both forms of care are derived from retrospective and prospective cohort studies. There have been no randomised trials, and recognising the deficiencies in the literature, there have been calls for methodologically rigorous studies to assess maternal and infant health outcomes associated with both care policies. The aims of our study are to assess in women with a previous caesarean birth, who are eligible in the subsequent pregnancy for a vaginal birth, whether a policy of planned vaginal birth after caesarean compared with a policy of planned repeat caesarean affects the risk of serious complications for the woman and her infant.
Design: Multicentered patient preference study and a randomised clinical trial.
Inclusion criteria: Women with a single prior caesarean presenting in their next pregnancy with a single, live fetus in cephalic presentation, who have reached 37 weeks gestation, and who do not have a contraindication to a planned VBAC. Trial Entry & Randomisation: Eligible women will be given an information sheet during pregnancy, and will be recruited to the study from 37 weeks gestation after an obstetrician has confirmed eligibility for a planned vaginal birth. Written informed consent will be obtained. Women who consent to the patient preference study will be allocated their preference for either planned VBAC or planned, elective repeat caesarean. Women who consent to the randomised trial will be randomly allocated to either the planned vaginal birth after caesarean or planned elective repeat caesarean group. Treatment Groups: Women in the planned vaginal birth group will await spontaneous onset of labour whilst appropriate. Women in the elective repeat caesarean group will have this scheduled for between 38 and 40 weeks. Primary Study Outcome: Serious adverse infant outcome (death or serious morbidity).
Sample size: 2314 women in the patient preference study to show a difference in adverse neonatal outcome from 1.6% to 3.6% (p = 0.05, 80% power).
Similar articles
-
Planned vaginal birth or elective repeat caesarean: patient preference restricted cohort with nested randomised trial.PLoS Med. 2012;9(3):e1001192. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1001192. Epub 2012 Mar 13. PLoS Med. 2012. PMID: 22427749 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
Timing of birth for women with a twin pregnancy at term: a randomised controlled trial.BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2010 Oct 25;10:68. doi: 10.1186/1471-2393-10-68. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2010. PMID: 20973989 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
Vaginal delivery of breech presentation.J Obstet Gynaecol Can. 2009 Jun;31(6):557-566. doi: 10.1016/S1701-2163(16)34221-9. J Obstet Gynaecol Can. 2009. PMID: 19646324 English, French.
-
SOGC clinical practice guidelines. Guidelines for vaginal birth after previous caesarean birth. Number 155 (Replaces guideline Number 147), February 2005.Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2005 Jun;89(3):319-31. doi: 10.1016/j.ijgo.2005.03.015. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2005. PMID: 16001462 Review.
-
Delivery for women with a previous cesarean: guidelines for clinical practice from the French College of Gynecologists and Obstetricians (CNGOF).Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2013 Sep;170(1):25-32. doi: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2013.05.015. Epub 2013 Jun 28. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2013. PMID: 23810846 Review.
Cited by
-
Acceptance of trial of labor after cesarean (Tolac) among obstetricians in the Western Region of Saudi Arabia: A cross-sectional study.Saudi J Biol Sci. 2021 May;28(5):2795-2801. doi: 10.1016/j.sjbs.2021.02.010. Epub 2021 Feb 16. Saudi J Biol Sci. 2021. PMID: 34012321 Free PMC article.
-
Retrospective evidence on outcomes and experiences of pregnancy and childbirth in epidermolysis bullosa in Australia and New Zealand.Int J Womens Dermatol. 2017 Feb 16;3(1 Suppl):S1-S5. doi: 10.1016/j.ijwd.2017.02.002. eCollection 2017 Mar. Int J Womens Dermatol. 2017. PMID: 28492031 Free PMC article.
-
Optimal Timing of Cesarean Section Following Two or More Prior Cesareans: An Investigation Into Maternal and Neonatal Outcomes (a Two-Center Study).Cureus. 2024 Jul 10;16(7):e64291. doi: 10.7759/cureus.64291. eCollection 2024 Jul. Cureus. 2024. PMID: 39130828 Free PMC article.
-
Planned vaginal birth or elective repeat caesarean: patient preference restricted cohort with nested randomised trial.PLoS Med. 2012;9(3):e1001192. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1001192. Epub 2012 Mar 13. PLoS Med. 2012. PMID: 22427749 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
Retrospective evidence on outcomes and experiences of pregnancy and childbirth in epidermolysis bullosa in Australia and New Zealand.Int J Womens Dermatol. 2015 Feb 18;1(1):26-30. doi: 10.1016/j.ijwd.2014.12.005. eCollection 2015 Feb. Int J Womens Dermatol. 2015. PMID: 28491951 Free PMC article.
References
-
- RCOG . The Sentinel National Caesarean Section Audit Report- RCOG Clinical Effectiveness Support Unit. RCOG Press; 2001.
-
- AIHW . Perinatal Statistics Series Number 12. Sydney, ; 2003. Australia's mothers and babies 2000.
-
- Hamilton BE, Martin JA, Sutton PD. Birth: Preliminary data for 2002. Natl Vital Stat Rep. 2003;51:4–5. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical