The effect of anesthetic method for prophylactic cervical cerclage on plasma oxytocin: a randomized trial
- PMID: 17698336
- DOI: 10.1016/j.ijoa.2007.04.007
The effect of anesthetic method for prophylactic cervical cerclage on plasma oxytocin: a randomized trial
Abstract
Background: This study compared the changes in plasma oxytocin, intraoperative hemodynamics and postoperative uterine activity in patients who underwent elective Shirodkar cerclage for cervical incompetence with general or spinal anesthesia.
Methods: Thirty-seven singleton pregnant patients were enrolled in this prospective, randomized, controlled comparison of general (n=17) and spinal anesthesia (n=20) for elective Shirodkar suture in the second trimester. Plasma oxytocin concentration was measured before, 1 h after, and 24 h after the procedure. Uterine activity was recorded by external tocography twice daily for 30 min over a three-day period.
Results: Plasma oxytocin concentration did not change significantly after cerclage in either group. There were no significant differences between the two groups at any time. None of the patients reported painful contractions during study period. Two (11.8%) and four patients (20.0%) in the general and spinal groups, respectively (NS), showed increased uterine activity but these symptoms disappeared without treatment. The systolic blood pressure in the spinal group was significantly lower after anesthesia compared with the baseline and was significantly lower than in the general group during the procedure.
Conclusions: Anesthetic method used for elective Shirodkar procedure did not affect the perioperative changes in plasma oxytocin nor postoperative uterine activity.
Similar articles
-
Plasma oxytocin but not prostaglandin F2 alpha metabolite levels at cerclage may predict preterm delivery.Obstet Gynecol. 1991 Jun;77(6):879-84. Obstet Gynecol. 1991. PMID: 2030861
-
Effectiveness of double cervical cerclage in women with at least one previous pregnancy loss in the second trimester: a randomized controlled trial.J Obstet Gynaecol Res. 2009 Aug;35(4):666-71. doi: 10.1111/j.1447-0756.2008.01006.x. J Obstet Gynaecol Res. 2009. PMID: 19751325 Clinical Trial.
-
Comparison of success and morbidity in cervical cerclage procedures.Obstet Gynecol. 1980 Nov;56(5):543-8. Obstet Gynecol. 1980. PMID: 7001296
-
Management of painless mid-trimester cervical dilatation: Prophylactic vs emergency placement of cervical cerclage.J Obstet Gynaecol. 2008 Jan;28(1):24-7. doi: 10.1080/01443610701814229. J Obstet Gynaecol. 2008. PMID: 18259893 Review.
-
[What should you tell a patient with a history of cervical incompetence in the first trimester?].Gynecol Obstet Fertil. 2006 Feb;34(2):137-41. doi: 10.1016/j.gyobfe.2005.11.007. Epub 2006 Feb 17. Gynecol Obstet Fertil. 2006. PMID: 16483826 Review. French.
Cited by
-
Birth signalling hormones and the developmental consequences of caesarean delivery.J Neuroendocrinol. 2021 Jan;33(1):e12912. doi: 10.1111/jne.12912. Epub 2020 Nov 3. J Neuroendocrinol. 2021. PMID: 33145818 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Comparison of Outcomes Following General Anesthesia and Spinal Anesthesia During Emergency Cervical Cerclage in Singleton Pregnant Women in the Second Trimester at a Single Center.Med Sci Monit. 2022 Mar 7;28:e934771. doi: 10.12659/MSM.934771. Med Sci Monit. 2022. PMID: 35255077 Free PMC article.
-
Cervical stitch (cerclage) in combination with other treatments for preventing spontaneous preterm birth in singleton pregnancies.Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020 Sep 24;9(9):CD012871. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012871.pub2. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020. PMID: 32970845 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Miscellaneous