Value and limitations of contrast-enhanced MR angiography in spinal arteriovenous malformations and dural arteriovenous fistulas
- PMID: 17698524
- PMCID: PMC7977648
- DOI: 10.3174/ajnr.A0612
Value and limitations of contrast-enhanced MR angiography in spinal arteriovenous malformations and dural arteriovenous fistulas
Abstract
Background and purpose: The purpose of this work was to study the validity of MR angiography (MRA) for identification of spinal arteriovenous (AV) abnormalities.
Materials and methods: Thirty-four consecutive patients with suspicion of spinal vascular abnormalities underwent digital subtraction angiography (DSA) after MRA. The level and side of the suspected spinal dural arteriovenous fistula (SDAVF) and the feeding arteries in spinal arteriovenous malformations (SAVMs) were determined from the MRA and compared with DSA.
Results: DSA revealed SDAVF in 20 abnormalities of which 19 were spinal and 1 was tentorial with spinal drainage, as well as SAVM in 11 patients. In 3 patients, MRA and DSA were both normal. For detection of spinal arteriovenous abnormalities, neither false-positive nor false-negative MRA results were obtained. The MRA-derived level of the feeding artery in SDAVF agreed with DSA in 14 of 19 cases. In 5 cases, a mismatch of 1 vertebral level (not side) was noted for the feeding artery. For the tentorial AVF, only the spinal drainage was depicted; the feeding artery was outside the MRA field of view. In intradural SAVM, the main feeding artery was identified by MRA in 10 of 11 patients. MRA could differentiate between glomerular and fistulous SAVM in 4 of 6 cases and between sacral SDAVF and filum terminale SAVM in 2 of 5 cases.
Conclusions: MRA reliably detects or excludes various types of spinal AV abnormalities and localizes the (predominant) arterial feeder of most spinal AV shunts. Although classification of the subtype of SAVMs remains difficult, with MRA it greatly helps to focus subsequent DSA.
Figures






Comment in
-
Investigating vascular myelopathy--when can magnetic resonance angiography replace digital subtraction angiography?Nat Clin Pract Neurol. 2008 May;4(5):244-5. doi: 10.1038/ncpneuro0747. Epub 2008 Feb 19. Nat Clin Pract Neurol. 2008. PMID: 18285750 No abstract available.
References
-
- Berenstein A, Lasjaunias P. Spine and spinal cord vascular lesions. In: Surgical Neuroangiography. Vol 5. Berlin: Springer-Verlag;1992. :1–85
-
- Thron AK. Vascular anatomy of the spinal cord. Wien, New York: Springer-Verlag;1988. :3–5
-
- Brandt T, Caplan LR, Dichgans J, et al. Vascular malformations and interventional neuradiology of the spinal cord. In: Brandt T, et al, eds. Neurological Disorders Course and Treatment. 2nd ed. Boston: Academic Press;2003. :517–28
-
- Forbes G, Nichols DA, Jack CR Jr, et al. Complications of spinal cord arteriography: prospective assessment of risk for diagnostic procedures. Radiology 1988;169:479–84 - PubMed
-
- Krings T, Mull M, Gilsbach JM, et al. Spinal vascular malformations. Eur Radiol 2005;15:267–78 - PubMed
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical