Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comparative Study
. 2007 Aug 14;177(4):352-6.
doi: 10.1503/cmaj.060920.

Comparison of obstetric outcomes between on-call and patients' own obstetricians

Affiliations
Comparative Study

Comparison of obstetric outcomes between on-call and patients' own obstetricians

Haim A Abenhaim et al. CMAJ. .

Abstract

Background: The question "will you be delivering my baby?" is one that pregnant women frequently ask their physicians. We sought to determine whether obstetric outcomes differed between women whose babies were delivered by their own obstetrician (regular-care obstetrician) and those attended by an on-call obstetrician who did not provide antenatal care.

Methods: We performed a cohort study of all live singleton term births between 1991 and 2001 at the Royal Victoria Hospital in Montréal. We excluded breech deliveries, elective cesarean sections and deliveries with placenta previa or prolapse of the umbilical cord. Logistic regression analysis was used to compare obstetric outcomes (e.g., cesarean delivery, instrumental vaginal delivery and episiotomy) between the regular-care and on-call obstetricians after adjustment for potential confounders.

Results: A total of 28,332 eligible deliveries were attended by 26 obstetricians: 21,779 (76.9%) by the patient's own obstetrician and 6553 (23.1%) by the on-call obstetrician. Compared with women attended by their regular-care obstetrician, those attended by an on-call obstetrician had higher rates of cesarean delivery (11.9% v. 11.4%, adjusted odds ratio [OR] 1.13, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.03-1.24, p < 0.01) and of third-or fourth-degree tears (7.9% v. 6.4%, adjusted OR 1.21, 95% CI 1.07-1.36, p < 0.01) but lower rates of episiotomy (38.5% v. 42.9%, OR 0.77, 95% CI 0.72-0.82, p < 0.001). No differences were observed between the groups in the rate of instrumental vaginal delivery. The increase in the overall rate of cesarean delivery among women attended by an on-call obstetrician was due mainly to an increase in cesarean deliveries during the first stage of labour because of nonreassuring fetal heart tracing (2.9% v. 1.7%, adjusted OR 1.79, 95% CI 1.49-2.15, p < 0.001). The time of day of delivery did not modify the observed effects.

Interpretation: The type of attending obstetrician (regular care v. on call) had a minor effect on obstetric outcomes.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

None
Figure 1: Forest plot showing the odds ratios for cesarean and vaginal deliveries attended by on-call obstetricians.

Comment in

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Borenstein SH, Choi M, Gerstle JT, et al. Errors and adverse outcomes on a surgical service: What is the role of residents? J Surg Res 2004;122:162-6. - PubMed
    1. Goldberg J, Gopal M, Singhal R, et al. Nighttime call in house vs. out of house: a comparison of obstetric procedure rates. J Reprod Med 2004;49:143-7. - PubMed
    1. Jakubowicz DM, Price EM, Glassman HJ, et al. Effects of a twenty-four hour call period on resident performance during simulated endoscopic sinus surgery in an accreditation council for graduate medical education-compliant training program. Laryngoscope 2005;115:143-6. - PubMed
    1. Mann FA, Danz PL. The night stalker effect: quality improvements with a dedicated night-call rotation. Invest Radiol 1993;28:92-6. - PubMed
    1. Scotti RJ. Compliance with the 24-hour, in-house attending coverage requirement. A survey. J Reprod Med 1995;40:101-6. - PubMed

Publication types