Hemodialysis blood access flow rates can be estimated accurately from on-line dialysate urea measurements and the knowledge of effective dialyzer urea clearance
- PMID: 17699313
- DOI: 10.2215/CJN.00810306
Hemodialysis blood access flow rates can be estimated accurately from on-line dialysate urea measurements and the knowledge of effective dialyzer urea clearance
Abstract
Measurement of blood flow rate (Qa) is used to monitor arteriovenous fistulas and grafts that are used for hemodialysis blood access. Most Qa measurements use indicator dilution techniques to measure the recirculation that is induced by the reversal of hemodialysis blood lines. R plus the dialysis circuit flow (Qb) allows the calculation of Qa. The principle of needle reversal also can be used with a dialysate urea monitor (e.g., DQM 200 [Gambro]) without injection of diluent; the effect of the reversal on urea concentration is observed. Access blood water flow rate (Qaw) in relation to the effective clearance (K) is found from the urea concentrations in the dialysate with needles in the normal (Cn) and reverse (Cr) positions: K/Qaw = (Cn - Cr)/Cr. Qa is calculated by adjusting Qaw for hematocrit and protein. For testing of this theoretical relationship, 20 patients who were dialyzed on Integra (Hospal) and Centrysystem 3 (Cobe) machines that were fitted with DQM 200 were studied. During each treatment, lines were reversed and Qa was measured by ultrasound velocity dilution (Transonic HD01 monitor); at the same time, Cn and Cr were measured by DQM 200 and K was calculated. K1 was determined from a predialysis blood urea concentration (Cb), initial dialysate urea concentration (Cd), dialysate flow rate (Qd), and the relationship K x Cb = Qd x Cd (K1). K was determined separately from a conductivity step method using Diascan (Hospal) attached to Integra machines only (K2). With the use of K1, 127 comparisons were made; a correlation existed (r = 0.916), although Bland-Altman analysis showed that the dialysate urea method gave a mean value 5.3% +/- 15.3 (+/-SD) higher than that of Transonic (P < 0.001). With the use of K2, there also was a correlation of (r = 0.944; n = 63), and Bland-Altman testing showed an NS difference of +3.5% between the dialysate urea and Transonic methods. Qa can be estimated from on-line dialysate urea measurements that are taken before and after line reversal together with knowledge of K.
Similar articles
-
Relationship between effective ionic dialysance and in vivo urea clearance during hemodialysis.Am J Kidney Dis. 2001 Sep;38(3):565-74. doi: 10.1053/ajkd.2001.26874. Am J Kidney Dis. 2001. PMID: 11532690
-
A comparison of methods for the measurement of hemodialysis access recirculation and access blood flow rate.ASAIO J. 1998 Jan-Feb;44(1):62-7. ASAIO J. 1998. PMID: 9466503 Clinical Trial.
-
A comparison of methods for the measurement of hemodialysis access recirculation.J Nephrol. 2003 Nov-Dec;16(6):908-13. J Nephrol. 2003. PMID: 14736020
-
Haemodialysis with on-line monitoring equipment: tools or toys?Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2005 Jan;20(1):22-33. doi: 10.1093/ndt/gfh555. Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2005. PMID: 15632348 Review.
-
Theoretical and practical issues in recirculation; assessment of vascular access.EDTNA ERCA J. 1998 Apr-Jun;24(2):3-6. EDTNA ERCA J. 1998. PMID: 10392054 Review.
Cited by
-
Surveillance of hemodialysis vascular access.Semin Intervent Radiol. 2009 Jun;26(2):130-8. doi: 10.1055/s-0029-1222457. Semin Intervent Radiol. 2009. PMID: 21326504 Free PMC article.
-
The measurement of hemodialysis access blood flow by a conductivity step method.Clin J Am Soc Nephrol. 2010 Sep;5(9):1602-6. doi: 10.2215/CJN.01810210. Epub 2010 Jul 8. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol. 2010. PMID: 20616158 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Miscellaneous