The impact of surgical wait time on patient-based outcomes in posterior lumbar spinal surgery
- PMID: 17701060
- PMCID: PMC2223329
- DOI: 10.1007/s00586-007-0452-5
The impact of surgical wait time on patient-based outcomes in posterior lumbar spinal surgery
Abstract
A prospective observational study was conducted on patients undergoing posterior lumbar spine surgery for degenerative spinal disorders. The study purpose was to evaluate the effect of wait time to surgery on patient derived generic and disease specific functional outcome following surgery. A prolonged wait to surgery may adversely affect surgical outcome. Although there is literature on the effect of wait time to surgery in surgical fields such as oncology, cardiac, opthamologic, and total joint arthroplasty, little is known regarding the effect of wait time to surgery as it pertains to the spinal surgical population. Consecutive patients undergoing elective posterior lumbar spinal surgery for degenerative disorders were recruited. Short-Form 36 and Oswestry disability questionnaires were administered (pre-operatively, and at 6 weeks, 6 months, and 1 year post-operatively). Patients completed a questionnaire regarding their experience with the wait time to surgery. The study cohort consisted of 70 patients with follow-up in 53/70 (76%). Time intervals from the onset of patient symptoms to initial consultation by family physician through investigations, spinal surgical consultation and surgery were quantified. Time intervals were compared to patient specific improvements in reported outcome following surgery using Cox Regression analysis. The effect of patient and surgical parameters on wait time was evaluated using the median time as a reference for those patients who had either a longer or shorter wait. Significant improvements in patient derived outcome were observed comparing post-operative to pre-operative baseline scores. The greatest improvements were observed in aspects relating to physical function and pain. A longer wait to surgery was associated with less improvement in outcome following surgery (SF-36 domains of BP, GH, RP, VT). A longer wait time to surgery negatively influences the results of posterior lumbar spinal surgery for degenerative conditions as quantified by patient derived functional outcome measures. The parameters of pain severity and physical aspects of function appear to be the most significantly affected.
Figures
Comment in
-
The impact of surgical wait time on patient-based outcomes in posterior lumbar spine surgery (by J. Braybrooke et al.).Eur Spine J. 2007 Nov;16(11):1840-1. doi: 10.1007/s00586-007-0453-4. Epub 2007 Aug 8. Eur Spine J. 2007. PMID: 17684776 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
Similar articles
-
The Use of a Self-Administered Questionnaire to Reduce Consultation Wait Times for Potential Elective Lumbar Spinal Surgical Candidates: A Prospective, Pragmatic, Blinded, Randomized Controlled Quality Improvement Study.J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2018 Dec 19;100(24):2125-2131. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.18.00423. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2018. PMID: 30562293 Clinical Trial.
-
Does the number of levels affect lumbar fusion outcome?Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2005 Mar 15;30(6):675-81. doi: 10.1097/01.brs.0000155418.21183.ec. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2005. PMID: 15770184
-
The clinical course of symptoms during wait time for lumbar spinal stenosis surgery and its effect on postoperative outcome: a retrospective cohort study.Spine J. 2024 Apr;24(4):644-649. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2023.11.006. Epub 2023 Nov 25. Spine J. 2024. PMID: 38008188
-
Degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis: cohort of 670 patients, and proposal of a new classification.Orthop Traumatol Surg Res. 2014 Oct;100(6 Suppl):S311-5. doi: 10.1016/j.otsr.2014.07.006. Epub 2014 Sep 5. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res. 2014. PMID: 25201282 Review.
-
Outcome assessment in lumbar spine surgery.Acta Orthop Suppl. 2005 Jun;76(318):5-47. Acta Orthop Suppl. 2005. PMID: 16175972 Review.
Cited by
-
The impact of waiting time on patient outcomes: Evidence from early intervention in psychosis services in England.Health Econ. 2018 Nov;27(11):1772-1787. doi: 10.1002/hec.3800. Epub 2018 Jul 16. Health Econ. 2018. PMID: 30014544 Free PMC article.
-
Risk Factors Involved in the Early and Medium-Term Poor Outcomes of Percutaneous Endoscopic Transforaminal Discectomy: A Single-Center Experience.J Pain Res. 2022 Sep 15;15:2927-2938. doi: 10.2147/JPR.S380946. eCollection 2022. J Pain Res. 2022. PMID: 36132995 Free PMC article.
-
Letter to the Editor concerning "Real-time video communication during percutaneous transforaminal endoscopic discectomy is beneficial to postoperative recovery: a single-center retrospective study" by Z. Pan, et al. (Eur Spine J [2025]: doi: 10.1007/s00586-025-08777-1).Eur Spine J. 2025 Jul;34(7):3042-3043. doi: 10.1007/s00586-025-08876-z. Epub 2025 Apr 24. Eur Spine J. 2025. PMID: 40272493 No abstract available.
-
Cost consequence analysis of waiting for lumbar disc herniation surgery.Sci Rep. 2023 Mar 18;13(1):4519. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-31029-5. Sci Rep. 2023. PMID: 36934112 Free PMC article.
-
Access to orthopedic specialist service in Ontario via eConsult.Can J Surg. 2022 Sep 28;65(5):E643-E649. doi: 10.1503/cjs.005820. Print 2022 Sep-Oct. Can J Surg. 2022. PMID: 36170983 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Conner-Spady BL, Sanmugasunderam S, Courtright P, et al. The prioritization of patients on waiting lists for cataract surgery: validation of the Western Canada waiting list project cataract priority criteria tool. Ophthalmic Epidemiol. 2005;12(2):81–90. doi: 10.1080/09286580590932770. - DOI - PubMed
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources