Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2007 Mar;13(1):25-43.
doi: 10.1007/s11948-006-0007-x.

A code of ethics for the life sciences

Affiliations

A code of ethics for the life sciences

Nancy L Jones. Sci Eng Ethics. 2007 Mar.

Abstract

The activities of the life sciences are essential to provide solutions for the future, for both individuals and society. Society has demanded growing accountability from the scientific community as implications of life science research rise in influence and there are concerns about the credibility, integrity and motives of science. While the scientific community has responded to concerns about its integrity in part by initiating training in research integrity and the responsible conduct of research, this approach is minimal. The scientific community justifies itself by appealing to the ethos of science, claiming academic freedom, self-direction, and self-regulation, but no comprehensive codification of this foundational ethos has been forthcoming. A review of the professional norms of science and a prototype code of ethics for the life sciences provide a framework to spur discussions within the scientific community to define scientific professionalism. A formalization of implicit principles can provide guidance for recognizing divergence from the norms, place these norms within a context that would enhance education of trainees, and provide a framework for discussing externally and internally applied pressures that are influencing the practice of science. The prototype code articulates the goal for life sciences research and the responsibilities associated with the freedom of exploration, the principles for the practice of science, and the virtues of the scientists themselves. The time is ripe for scientific communities to reinvigorate professionalism and define the basis of their social contract. Codifying the basis of the social contract between science and society will sustain public trust in the scientific enterprise.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. JAMA. 1998 Jan 7;279(1):41-7 - PubMed
    1. J Dent Res. 1994 Nov;73(11):1759-65 - PubMed
    1. Sci Eng Ethics. 1997 Apr;3(2):137-43 - PubMed
    1. Sci Eng Ethics. 2003 Apr;9(2):139-40 - PubMed
    1. Science. 1977 Nov 18;198(4318):699-705 - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources