[Influence of material on biocompatibility of intraocular lenses]
- PMID: 17703722
[Influence of material on biocompatibility of intraocular lenses]
Abstract
There are many types of intraocular lenses (IOL), different in optic features and materials. The first indication for IOL implantation was aphakia after cataract surgery. The problem of aphakia exists as long as cataract is treated, that is at least 45 hundreds of years. Correction of aphakia using glasses is uncomfortable for patients and even impossible in some cases. The invention of an artificial intraocular lens was a crucial event in the history of ophthalmology. Nowadays there are more indications for cataract surgery and implantation of intraocular lens, including correction of refractive errors. The first intraocular lenses were made of rigid plastic: polymethylmethacrylate (PMMA). In present times foldable intraocular lenses made of soft material: silicone, hydrogel and acrylic compounds are also produced. In this paper 4 groups of intraocular lenses: PMMA, silicone, hydrogel, acrylic and their influence on biocompatibility are discussed. This article contains also description of two types of IOL biocompatibility: uveal and capsular. Their clinical aspects, especially posterior capsule opacification are discussed. Factors affecting biocompatibility are shortly described. Some historical applications of IOL are presented. Regarding the latest experimental studies on improving IOL biocompatibility, results of IOL surface modification tests are presented. New perspective technologies of intraocular artificial lens production such as single crystal materials are also discussed.
Similar articles
-
Influence of intraocular lens material and design on postoperative intracapsular cellular reactivity.Trans Am Ophthalmol Soc. 2000;98:257-83. Trans Am Ophthalmol Soc. 2000. PMID: 11190028 Free PMC article.
-
Hydrophobic acrylic versus heparin surface-modified polymethylmethacrylate intraocular lens: a biocompatibility study.Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2003 Aug;241(8):625-30. doi: 10.1007/s00417-003-0711-z. Epub 2003 Jul 17. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2003. PMID: 12883913 Clinical Trial.
-
Uveal and capsular biocompatibility of a single-piece, sharp-edged hydrophilic acrylic intraocular lens with collagen (Collamer): 1-year results.J Cataract Refract Surg. 2004 Jun;30(6):1254-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrs.2003.11.041. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2004. PMID: 15177600
-
[Effect of different shape and material of intraocular lens on posterior capsule opacification].Klin Oczna. 2005;107(1-3):156-8. Klin Oczna. 2005. PMID: 16052830 Review. Polish.
-
Intraocular lens materials and styles: a review.Aust N Z J Ophthalmol. 1997 Nov;25(4):255-63. doi: 10.1111/j.1442-9071.1997.tb01512.x. Aust N Z J Ophthalmol. 1997. PMID: 9395827 Review.
Cited by
-
Budget impact analysis of lens material on the posterior capsule opacification (PCO) as a complication after the cataract surgery.Cost Eff Resour Alloc. 2020 Jun 16;18:19. doi: 10.1186/s12962-020-00214-y. eCollection 2020. Cost Eff Resour Alloc. 2020. PMID: 32549794 Free PMC article.
-
An overview of the influence and design of biomaterial of the intraocular implant of the posterior capsule opacification.Rom J Ophthalmol. 2018 Jul-Sep;62(3):188-193. Rom J Ophthalmol. 2018. PMID: 30505987 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Biomaterial Influence on Intraocular Lens Performance: An Overview.J Ophthalmol. 2018 Mar 15;2018:2687385. doi: 10.1155/2018/2687385. eCollection 2018. J Ophthalmol. 2018. PMID: 29736282 Free PMC article. Review.