Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2008 Nov;12(6):860-6.
doi: 10.1007/s10461-007-9301-0. Epub 2007 Aug 18.

The use of rectal douches among HIV-uninfected and infected men who have unprotected receptive anal intercourse: implications for rectal microbicides

Affiliations

The use of rectal douches among HIV-uninfected and infected men who have unprotected receptive anal intercourse: implications for rectal microbicides

Alex Carballo-Diéguez et al. AIDS Behav. 2008 Nov.

Abstract

Although some rectal douches result in surface epithelium loss and potential increase of HIV transmission, men who have sex with men (MSM) continue to use them. We describe the prevalence of this practice among MSM engaging in unprotected receptive anal intercourse (URAI) in risky circumstances. A multiethnic sample with overrepresentation of HIV-negative MSM who had URAI in the previous year was recruited exclusively through the Internet. Participants were 105 MSM (78 HIV-negative, 27 HIV-positive). A total of 53% of HIV-negative and 96% of HIV-positive men douched in preparation for sex, most of them frequently or always, mainly for hygienic purposes. 27% of HIV-negative and 44% of HIV-positive douched after sex, partly believing douching protected from infections. Douching practices started around age 25. Regression analyses found the association between HIV status and douching occasions persisted after controlling for demographic characteristics and number of URAI occasions. Rectal douching in preparation for sex is common among men who practice URAI. This population could benefit from alternatives to condoms, such as rectal microbicides. Given the popularity of pre-coital douching and its frequency, a harmless rectal douche that could deliver a rectal microbicide could have great acceptability.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Bienzle U, Guggenmoos-Holzmann I, Zwingenberger K, Thommsen R, Ritter K, Uy A, et al. Lymphadenopathy and antibodies to HTLV-III in homosexual men Clinical, laboratory and epidemiological features. Journal of Molecular Medicine. 1985;63:597–602. - PubMed
    1. Carballo-Diéguez A, Bauermeister JA. “Barebacking”: intentional condomless anal sex in HIV-risk contexts: Reasons for and against it. Journal of Homosexuality. 2004;47:1–16. - PubMed
    1. Carballo-Diéguez A, Dowsett GA, Ventuneac A, Remien RH, Balan I, Dolezal C, Luciano O, Lin P. Cybercartography of popular Internet sites used by New York City men who have sex with men interested in bareback sex. AIDS Education & Prevention. 2006;18(6):475–489. - PubMed
    1. Carballo-Diéguez A, Exner T, Dolezal C, Pickard R, Lin P, Mayer KH. Rectal microbicide acceptability: Results of a volume escalation trial. Sexually Transmitted Diseases. 2007;34(4):224–229. - PubMed
    1. Carballo-Diéguez A, Stein Z, Saez H, Dolezal C, Nieves-Rosa L, Diaz F. Frequent use of lubricants for anal sex among men who have sex with men: the HIV prevention potential of a microbicidal gel. American Journal of Public Health. 1999;90:1117–1121. - PMC - PubMed

Substances