Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2007 Sep;10(3):275-93.
doi: 10.1007/s10567-007-0024-6.

The role of emotion regulation in the treatment of child anxiety disorders

Affiliations
Review

The role of emotion regulation in the treatment of child anxiety disorders

Dagmar Kristin Hannesdottir et al. Clin Child Fam Psychol Rev. 2007 Sep.

Abstract

In this review, we examine the role of emotion regulation in the treatment of children with anxiety disorders. Cognitive-behavioral therapy (CBT) has been shown to "work" for children with anxiety disorders and it has been categorized as an evidence-based treatment. However, most studies have shown that the treatment is effective for about 60-70% of children, leaving the remaining children symptomatic and oftentimes with persisting psychological disorders. Of importance, it has also been shown that many children with anxiety disorders demonstrate poor emotion regulation skills. Despite these findings, little attention has been directed toward incorporating emotion regulation strategies into these relatively effective cognitive-behavioral treatments. It is possible that CBT programs do not work as well for a portion of children because their emotion regulation deficits, if present, are not being targeted sufficiently. In this review, it is suggested that adding an emotion regulation component could increase treatment efficacy. In addition, strategies aimed at improving emotion regulation at the individual level and at the family level are introduced. Details of how improved emotion regulation skills could be beneficial in bringing about change are discussed. Finally, issues of measurement and the clinical implications for research and practice are considered.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Arch Gen Psychiatry. 2000 Sep;57(9):859-66 - PubMed
    1. J Pers Soc Psychol. 2004 Feb;86(2):320-33 - PubMed
    1. Dev Psychol. 1997 Nov;33(6):906-16 - PubMed
    1. Emotion. 2005 Mar;5(1):113-8 - PubMed
    1. Monogr Soc Res Child Dev. 1994;59(2-3):73-100 - PubMed