Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2007 Aug 16:8:47.
doi: 10.1186/1471-2296-8-47.

Information from the Internet and the doctor-patient relationship: the patient perspective--a qualitative study

Affiliations

Information from the Internet and the doctor-patient relationship: the patient perspective--a qualitative study

Fiona A Stevenson et al. BMC Fam Pract. .

Abstract

Background: Both doctors and patients may perceive the Internet as a potential challenge to existing therapeutic relationships. Here we examine patients' views of the effect of the Internet on their relationship with doctors.

Methods: We ran 8 disease specific focus groups of between 2 and 8 respondents comprising adult patients with diabetes mellitus, ischaemic heart disease or hepatitis C.

Results: Data are presented on (i) the perceived benefits and (ii) limitations of the Internet in the context of the doctor-patient relationship, (iii) views on sharing information with doctors, and (iv) the potential of the Internet for the future. Information from the Internet was particularly valued in relation to experiential knowledge.

Conclusion: Despite evidence of increasing patient activism in seeking information and the potential to challenge the position of the doctor, the accounts here do not in any way suggest a desire to disrupt the existing balance of power, or roles, in the consultation. Patients appear to see the Internet as an additional resource to support existing and valued relationships with their doctors. Doctors therefore need not feel challenged or threatened when patients bring health information from the Internet to a consultation, rather they should see it as an attempt on the part of the patient to work with the doctor and respond positively.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Williams P, Nicholas D, Huntington P, Gunter B. Doc.com: reviewing the literature on remote health information provision. Aslib Proc. 2002;54:127–141. doi: 10.1108/00012530210435257. - DOI
    1. Department of Health Patient and public involvement in the new NHS London. 1999.
    1. Department of Health Supporting people with long term conditions London. 2005.
    1. Nettleton S, Burrows R, O'Malley L. The mundane realities of the everyday lay use of the Internet for health, and their consequences for media convergence. Sociol Health & Illn. 2005;27:972–992. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9566.2005.00466.x. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Ziebland S, Chapple A, Dumelow C, Evans J, Prinjha S, Rozmovits L. How the Internet affects patients' experience of cancer: a qualitative study. Br Med J. 2004;8:564–569. doi: 10.1136/bmj.328.7439.564. - DOI - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms