Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2007 Aug 17:7:130.
doi: 10.1186/1472-6963-7-130.

Patient, informal caregiver and care provider acceptance of a hospital in the home program in Ontario, Canada

Affiliations

Patient, informal caregiver and care provider acceptance of a hospital in the home program in Ontario, Canada

Jacques Lemelin et al. BMC Health Serv Res. .

Abstract

Background: Hospital in the home programs have been implemented in several countries and have been shown to be safe substitutions (alternatives) to in-patient hospitalization. These programs may offer a solution to the increasing demands made on tertiary care facilities and to surge capacity. We investigated the acceptance of this type of care provision with nurse practitioners as the designated principal home care providers in a family medicine program in a large Canadian urban setting.

Methods: Patients requiring hospitalization to the family medicine service ward, for any diagnosis, who met selection criteria, were invited to enter the hospital in the home program as an alternative to admission. Participants in the hospital in the home program, their caregivers, and the physicians responsible for their care were surveyed about their perceptions of the program. Nurse practitioners, who provided care, were surveyed and interviewed.

Results: Ten percent (104) of admissions to the ward were screened, and 37 patients participated in 44 home hospital admissions. Twenty nine patient, 17 caregiver and 38 provider surveys were completed. Most patients (88%-100%) and caregivers (92%-100%) reported high satisfaction levels with various aspects of health service delivery. However, a significant proportion in both groups stated that they would select to be treated in-hospital should the need arise again. This was usually due to fears about the safety of the program. Physicians (98%-100%) and nurse practitioners also rated the program highly. The program had virtually no negative impact on the physician workload. However nurse practitioners felt that the program did not utilize their full expertise.

Conclusion: Provision of hospital level care in the home is well received by patients, their caregivers and health care providers. As a new program, investment in patient education about program safety may be necessary to ensure its long term success. A small proportion of hospital admissions were screened for this program. Appropriate dissemination of program information to family physicians should help buy-in and participation. Nurse practitioners' skills may not be optimally utilized in this setting.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Eligibility. Inclusion criteria and recruitment of patient participants.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Results of patient survey. Patient satisfaction with services.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Results of caregiver survey. Caregiver satisfaction with services.
Figure 4
Figure 4
Results of physician satisfaction survey. Physician satisfaction with services.
Figure 5
Figure 5
Results of physician survey regarding program adequacy. Physicians' perceptions of program adequacy.

References

    1. Romanow RJ. Building on Values: The Future of Health Care in Canada – Final Report. Commission on the Future of Health Care in Canada. Ottawa, Canada, Government of Canada; pp. 1–392. 1-11-2002. Ref Type: Generic.
    1. Caplan GA, Ward JA, Brennan NJ, Coconis J, Board N, Brown A. Hospital in the home: a randomised controlled trial.[see comment] Medical Journal of Australia. 1999;170:156–60. - PubMed
    1. Iliffe S, Shepperd S. What do we know about hospital at home? Lessons from international experience. [Review] [48 refs] Applied Health Economics & Health Policy. 2002;1:141–7. - PubMed
    1. Martin CM, Hogg W, Lemelin J, Nunn K, Molnar FJ, Viner G. Acute hospital services in the home. New role for modern primary health care? Canadian Family Physician Medecin De Famille Canadien. 2004;50:965. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Leff B, Montalto M. Home hospital-toward a tighter definition.[comment] Journal of the American Geriatrics Society. 2004;52:2141. doi: 10.1111/j.1532-5415.2004.52579_1.x. - DOI - PubMed