Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2007 Aug 15;2(8):e751.
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0000751.

Optimal conservation of migratory species

Affiliations

Optimal conservation of migratory species

Tara G Martin et al. PLoS One. .

Abstract

Background: Migratory animals comprise a significant portion of biodiversity worldwide with annual investment for their conservation exceeding several billion dollars. Designing effective conservation plans presents enormous challenges. Migratory species are influenced by multiple events across land and sea-regions that are often separated by thousands of kilometres and span international borders. To date, conservation strategies for migratory species fail to take into account how migratory animals are spatially connected between different periods of the annual cycle (i.e. migratory connectivity) bringing into question the utility and efficiency of current conservation efforts.

Methodology/principal findings: Here, we report the first framework for determining an optimal conservation strategy for a migratory species. Employing a decision theoretic approach using dynamic optimization, we address the problem of how to allocate resources for habitat conservation for a Neotropical-Nearctic migratory bird, the American redstart Setophaga ruticilla, whose winter habitat is under threat. Our first conservation strategy used the acquisition of winter habitat based on land cost, relative bird density, and the rate of habitat loss to maximize the abundance of birds on the wintering grounds. Our second strategy maximized bird abundance across the entire range of the species by adding the constraint of maintaining a minimum percentage of birds within each breeding region in North America using information on migratory connectivity as estimated from stable-hydrogen isotopes in feathers. We show that failure to take into account migratory connectivity may doom some regional populations to extinction, whereas including information on migratory connectivity results in the protection of the species across its entire range.

Conclusions/significance: We demonstrate that conservation strategies for migratory animals depend critically upon two factors: knowledge of migratory connectivity and the correct statement of the conservation problem. Our framework can be used to identify efficient conservation strategies for migratory taxa worldwide, including insects, birds, mammals, and marine organisms.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Competing Interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1. Patterns of connectivity in American redstarts.
The distribution of the most likely breeding region (NW, Northwest; MW, Midwest; NE, Northeast; CE, Central-east; SE, Southeast) for individuals at each wintering region (M, Mexico; C, Central America; W, Western Greater Antilles; E, Eastern Greater Antilles; L, Lesser Antilles/South America). Black dots indicate sampling locations and bars indicate the proportion of individuals assigned to each breeding region (rounded to the nearest 5%) [adapted from ref 14].
Figure 2
Figure 2. The total number of parcels purchased in each region over a 45-year time-horizon.
When the objective is to (a) maximize the number of birds on the wintering grounds and (b) maximize the number of birds on the wintering grounds and protect a minimum of 30% of birds in each breeding region by taking migratory connectivity into account.
Figure 3
Figure 3. The proportion of the summer breeding population protected, through the conservation of habitat parcels in the wintering regions with an optimal strategy that ignores migratory connectivity and one that incorporates migratory connectivity.
The Northwest population is reduced to less than 2%, well below the 30% threshold, when connectivity data are ignored as denoted by the arrow.

References

    1. Rappole JH. Washington, D.C.: Smithsonian Institution Press; 1995. The Ecology of Migrant Birds: A Neotropical Perspective.
    1. Webster MS, Marra PP, Haig SM, Bensch S, Holmes RT. Links between worlds: unraveling migratory connectivity. TREE. 2002;17:76–83.
    1. Williams PH, Araujo MB. Using probability of persistence to identify important areas for biodiversity conservation. Proceedings of the Royal Society London Series B. 2000;267:1959–1966. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Marra PP, Norris DR, Haig SM, Webster M, Royle JA. Migratory connectivity. In: Crooks K, Muttulingam S, editors. Maintaining Connections for Nature: Cambridge University Press, New York. in press.
    1. Anon . 2006. 2005 Annual Report-Migratory Bird Conservation Commission. http://www.fws.gov/realty/pdf_files/2005%20MBCC%20Report.pdf.

Publication types