Utility of repeat genotypic resistance testing and clinical response in patients with three class resistance and virologic treatment failure
- PMID: 17711379
- DOI: 10.1089/apc.2006.0156
Utility of repeat genotypic resistance testing and clinical response in patients with three class resistance and virologic treatment failure
Abstract
We sought to determine the utility of repeat genotypic resistance testing (GRT) and the clinical response in HIV-1-infected patients with known resistance to three of the major classes of antiretroviral drugs. The HIV-1 genetic sequences for 20 patients who had high-level 3 class resistance demonstrated on a prior GRT (3C-GRT 1) measured during the period from November 1, 2000 through July 1, 2004 were retrospectively evaluated. At the time of 3C-GRT 1, the median CD4 count and HIV-1 RNA viral load were 168 cells/mm(3) and 4.5 log copies per milliliter, respectively. The median time to the second GRT (3C-GRT 2) was 17 months. At that time, the median CD4 count and VL were 140 cells/mm(3) and 4.9 log copies per milliliter (p = 0.8 and p = 0.12, respectively). On 3C-GRT 2, all patients retained essentially identical mutations, with the exception of the loss of the M184V mutation in 6 patients. After 3C-GRT 2, all patients continued on protease inhibitor-containing highly active antiretroviral therapy (HAART) regimens. At 24 weeks after 3C-GRT 2, there was no significant change in CD4 count or HIV-1 RNA viral load (p = 0.68 and p = 0.30, respectively). Repeat GRT in patients with documented high-level 3 class resistance does not provide new or clinically useful information. Under continued antiretroviral selective pressure, the viral genetic sequences in this patient population remained stable. In addition, continuing HAART regimens containing protease inhibitors appeared to forestall further immunological and virologic deterioration in patients with multiple resistance mutations. Providers should focus on obtaining access to combinations of novel agents for patients with 3 class resistance rather than repeated GRT.
Similar articles
-
Study of the impact of HIV genotypic drug resistance testing on therapy efficacy.Verh K Acad Geneeskd Belg. 2001;63(5):447-73. Verh K Acad Geneeskd Belg. 2001. PMID: 11813503 Review.
-
How does expert advice impact genotypic resistance testing in clinical practice?Clin Infect Dis. 2003 Sep 1;37(5):708-13. doi: 10.1086/377266. Epub 2003 Aug 15. Clin Infect Dis. 2003. PMID: 12942405 Clinical Trial.
-
Natural residues versus antiretroviral drug-selected mutations in HIV type 1 group O reverse transcriptase and protease related to virological drug failure in vivo.AIDS Res Hum Retroviruses. 2000 Sep 20;16(14):1385-94. doi: 10.1089/08892220050140937. AIDS Res Hum Retroviruses. 2000. PMID: 11018858
-
The V118I mutation as a marker of advanced HIV infection and disease progression.Antivir Ther. 2007;12(2):163-8. Antivir Ther. 2007. PMID: 17503658
-
Genotypic testing for human immunodeficiency virus type 1 drug resistance.Clin Microbiol Rev. 2002 Apr;15(2):247-77. doi: 10.1128/CMR.15.2.247-277.2002. Clin Microbiol Rev. 2002. PMID: 11932232 Free PMC article. Review.
Cited by
-
"One pill, once daily": what clinicians need to know about Atriplatrade mark.Ther Clin Risk Manag. 2008 Apr;4(2):291-302. doi: 10.2147/tcrm.s1708. Ther Clin Risk Manag. 2008. PMID: 18728842 Free PMC article.
-
Antiretroviral therapy in Indian setting: when & what to start with, when & what to switch to?Indian J Med Res. 2011 Dec;134(6):787-800. doi: 10.4103/0971-5916.92626. Indian J Med Res. 2011. PMID: 22310814 Free PMC article. Review.
-
High Levels of Dual-Class Drug Resistance in HIV-Infected Children Failing First-Line Antiretroviral Therapy in Southern Ethiopia.Viruses. 2018 Feb 1;10(2):60. doi: 10.3390/v10020060. Viruses. 2018. PMID: 29389912 Free PMC article.
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Research Materials