Assessment of aortic valve area in aortic stenosis using cardiac magnetic resonance tomography: comparison with echocardiography
- PMID: 17713328
- DOI: 10.1159/000105554
Assessment of aortic valve area in aortic stenosis using cardiac magnetic resonance tomography: comparison with echocardiography
Abstract
Background: Cardiac magnetic resonance tomography (CMR) is a new imaging technique capable of imaging the aortic valve with high resolution. We assessed the aortic valve area (AVA) in patients with aortic stenosis (AS) using CMR and compared the results to those obtained by transthoracic echocardiography (TTE) and transesophageal echocardiography (TEE).
Methods: Forty-two patients (36% female, 71 +/- 8 years) symptomatic for AS underwent TTE followed by TEE to determine the AVA; the continuity equation was used with TTE and the planimetry technique with TEE. In 26 of these patients, the AVA was additionally obtained by CMR planimetry.
Results: The mean AVA derived by TTE, TEE and CMR were 0.74 +/- 0.27, 0.87 +/- 25 and 0.97 +/- 0.30 cm(2), respectively. The mean absolute differences in AVA were 0.13 +/- 0.19 cm(2) for TTE vs. TEE, 0.21 +/- 0.25 cm(2) for TTE vs. CMR and 0.05 +/- 0.11 cm(2) for CMR vs. TEE.
Conclusion: There is a good agreement between CMR and the echocardiographic determination of the AVA. If multicenter, large-scale studies confirm these observations, CMR could serve as a noninvasive alternative to TTE/TEE for the assessment of AVA in AS.
Comment in
-
What our eyes see is not necessarily what our heart feels.Cardiology. 2008;109(2):122-5. doi: 10.1159/000105553. Epub 2007 Aug 21. Cardiology. 2008. PMID: 17713327 No abstract available.
Similar articles
-
Evaluation of aortic stenosis using cardiovascular magnetic resonance: a systematic review & meta-analysis.J Cardiovasc Magn Reson. 2020 Jun 15;22(1):45. doi: 10.1186/s12968-020-00633-z. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson. 2020. PMID: 32536342 Free PMC article.
-
Absolute assessment of aortic valve stenosis by planimetry using cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging: comparison with transesophageal echocardiography, transthoracic echocardiography, and cardiac catheterisation.Eur J Radiol. 2006 Aug;59(2):276-83. doi: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2006.02.011. Eur J Radiol. 2006. PMID: 16873006
-
[Planar determination of the aortic valve area with transesophageal echocardiography with multiplanar probe in patients with aortic stenosis and insufficiency. Comparison with transthoracic Doppler echocardiography].G Ital Cardiol. 1995 Jul;25(7):851-7. G Ital Cardiol. 1995. PMID: 7557034 Clinical Trial. Italian.
-
Planimetric and continuity equation assessment of aortic valve area: Head to head comparison between cardiac magnetic resonance and echocardiography.J Magn Reson Imaging. 2007 Dec;26(6):1436-43. doi: 10.1002/jmri.21182. J Magn Reson Imaging. 2007. PMID: 17968960
-
Using cardiac magnetic resonance tomography for assessment of aortic valve area in aortic valve stenosis.Herz. 2006 Oct;31(7):650-7. doi: 10.1007/s00059-006-2907-6. Herz. 2006. PMID: 17072778 Review.
Cited by
-
Cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging for valvular heart disease.Curr Heart Fail Rep. 2009 Sep;6(3):160-6. doi: 10.1007/s11897-009-0023-7. Curr Heart Fail Rep. 2009. PMID: 19723457 Review.
-
Aortic Valve Area and Strain Measurements by Cardiac MRI and Transthoracic Echocardiography in Severe Aortic Stenosis with Normal Left Ventricular Function.Iran J Med Sci. 2023 Jul;48(4):370-378. doi: 10.30476/ijms.2022.94552.2590. Iran J Med Sci. 2023. PMID: 37456208 Free PMC article.
-
Comparison between cardiovascular magnetic resonance and transthoracic Doppler echocardiography for the estimation of effective orifice area in aortic stenosis.J Cardiovasc Magn Reson. 2011 Apr 28;13(1):25. doi: 10.1186/1532-429X-13-25. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson. 2011. PMID: 21527021 Free PMC article.
-
Aortic valve area: meta-analysis of diagnostic performance of multi-detector computed tomography for aortic valve area measurements as compared to transthoracic echocardiography.Int J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2009 Aug;25(6):601-9. doi: 10.1007/s10554-009-9464-z. Epub 2009 May 7. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2009. PMID: 19421893
-
Evaluation of aortic stenosis using cardiovascular magnetic resonance: a systematic review & meta-analysis.J Cardiovasc Magn Reson. 2020 Jun 15;22(1):45. doi: 10.1186/s12968-020-00633-z. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson. 2020. PMID: 32536342 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Research Materials