Effect of pinching-evoked pain on jaw-stretch reflexes and exteroceptive suppression periods in healthy subjects
- PMID: 17714986
- DOI: 10.1016/j.clinph.2007.07.002
Effect of pinching-evoked pain on jaw-stretch reflexes and exteroceptive suppression periods in healthy subjects
Abstract
Objective: To investigate the influence of conditioning cutaneous nociceptive inputs by a new "pinch" model on the jaw-stretch reflex and the exteroceptive suppression periods (ES1 and ES2) in jaw muscles.
Methods: The jaw-stretch reflex was evoked with the use of a custom-made muscle stretcher and electrical stimuli were used to evoke an early and late exteroceptive suppression period (ES1 and ES2) in the jaw-closing muscles. Electromyographic (EMG) activity was recorded bilaterally from the masseter and temporalis muscles. These brainstem reflexes were recorded in 19 healthy men (28.8+/-1.1 years) during three different conditions: one painful clip applied to the earlobe; one painful clip applied to the nostril, and four painful clips applied simultaneously to the earlobe, nostril, eyebrow, and lower lip. Pain intensity induced by the application of the clips was scored continuously by the subjects on a 100mm visual analogue scale (VAS).
Results: The highest VAS pain scores were evoked by placement of four clips (79+/-0.5mm). There was no significant modulation of the jaw-stretch reflex (ANOVAs: P=0.929), the ES1 (P=0.298) or ES2 (P=0.082) in any of the three painful conditions.
Conclusions: Intense and tonic cutaneous pain could be elicited by this new "pinch" pain model; however, there was no significant modulation on either excitatory or inhibitory brainstem reflex responses.
Significance: The novel observation that high-intensity pinch stimuli applied to the craniofacial region fail to modulate two different brainstem reflexes is in contrast to other experimental pain studies documented facilitation of the jaw-stretch reflexes or inhibition of exteroceptive suppression periods. The clinical implication of the present findings is that only some craniofacial pain conditions could be expected to show perturbation of the brainstem reflex responses.
Similar articles
-
Effect of experimental posterior temporalis muscle pain on human brainstem reflexes.Clin Neurophysiol. 2005 Jul;116(7):1611-20. doi: 10.1016/j.clinph.2005.02.022. Clin Neurophysiol. 2005. PMID: 15953560
-
Glutamate evoked neck and jaw muscle pain facilitate the human jaw stretch reflex.Clin Neurophysiol. 2004 Jun;115(6):1288-95. doi: 10.1016/j.clinph.2004.01.006. Clin Neurophysiol. 2004. PMID: 15134695 Clinical Trial.
-
Modulation of exteroceptive suppression periods in human jaw-closing muscles by local and remote experimental muscle pain.Pain. 1999 Sep;82(3):253-262. doi: 10.1016/S0304-3959(99)00058-5. Pain. 1999. PMID: 10488676
-
Are jaw and facial reflexes modulated during clinical or experimental orofacial pain?J Orofac Pain. 1998 Fall;12(4):260-71. J Orofac Pain. 1998. PMID: 10425972 Review.
-
Brainstem reflexes: electrodiagnostic techniques, physiology, normative data, and clinical applications.Muscle Nerve. 2002 Jul;26(1):14-30. doi: 10.1002/mus.10120. Muscle Nerve. 2002. PMID: 12115945 Review.
Cited by
-
Effects of NGF-induced muscle sensitization on proprioception and nociception.Exp Brain Res. 2008 Jul;189(1):1-10. doi: 10.1007/s00221-008-1399-4. Epub 2008 May 14. Exp Brain Res. 2008. PMID: 18478213 Clinical Trial.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Miscellaneous