Reallocating resources: how should the National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence guide disinvestment efforts in the National Health Service?
- PMID: 17716419
- DOI: 10.1258/135581907781542987
Reallocating resources: how should the National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence guide disinvestment efforts in the National Health Service?
Abstract
The recent acute budgetary pressures within the English National Health Service (NHS) have accentuated calls for targeted disinvestment thereby eliminating ineffective or low-value services to provide resources that can be reallocated toward more cost-effective purposes. This challenge extends beyond allocating new resources wisely, a goal that has been, since its inception, the primary focus of the National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence (NICE). But on 6 September 2006, the Department of Health announced a new mandate for NICE to help the NHS identify interventions that are not effective. This paper discusses current NICE efforts to support value in the NHS and then explores the policy options available to the Institute as it prepares to launch a programme to meet the NHS request for guidance on disinvestment. All of the possible options present challenges. NICE will need to collaborate in new ways with partners inside, and perhaps outside, the NHS. However, the Institute has an established reputation for rigour, transparency and political durability that makes it well qualified to sustain public support in the face of difficult decisions. Disinvestment will provide a stern test of these qualities.
Similar articles
-
How should cost-effectiveness analysis be used in health technology coverage decisions? Evidence from the National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence approach.J Health Serv Res Policy. 2007 Apr;12(2):73-9. doi: 10.1258/135581907780279521. J Health Serv Res Policy. 2007. PMID: 17407655
-
Patients' views of explicit rationing: what are the implications for health service decision-making?J Health Serv Res Policy. 2003 Jul;8(3):183-6. doi: 10.1258/135581903322029557. J Health Serv Res Policy. 2003. PMID: 12869346
-
Has NICE been nice to cancer?Eur J Cancer. 2006 Nov;42(17):2881-6. doi: 10.1016/j.ejca.2006.08.013. Epub 2006 Oct 27. Eur J Cancer. 2006. PMID: 17070032 Review.
-
Procedures and methods of benefit assessments for medicines in Germany.Eur J Health Econ. 2008 Nov;9 Suppl 1:5-29. doi: 10.1007/s10198-008-0122-5. Eur J Health Econ. 2008. PMID: 18987905
-
The National Institute for Clinical Excellence and the RCM.RCM Midwives J. 2002 Aug;5(8):260-1. RCM Midwives J. 2002. PMID: 12242758 Review.
Cited by
-
Mapping structure, process and outcomes in the removal of low-value care practices in Canadian intensive care units: protocol for a mixed-methods exploratory study.BMJ Open. 2019 Dec 16;9(12):e033333. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-033333. BMJ Open. 2019. PMID: 31848173 Free PMC article.
-
Sustainability in Health care by allocating resources effectively (SHARE) 1: introducing a series of papers reporting an investigation of disinvestment in a local healthcare setting.BMC Health Serv Res. 2017 May 4;17(1):323. doi: 10.1186/s12913-017-2210-7. BMC Health Serv Res. 2017. PMID: 28472962 Free PMC article.
-
Reorienting programme budgeting and marginal analysis (PBMA) towards disinvestment.BMC Health Serv Res. 2010 Oct 14;10:288. doi: 10.1186/1472-6963-10-288. BMC Health Serv Res. 2010. PMID: 20942972 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Sustainability in Health care by Allocating Resources Effectively (SHARE) 10: operationalising disinvestment in a conceptual framework for resource allocation.BMC Health Serv Res. 2017 Sep 8;17(1):632. doi: 10.1186/s12913-017-2506-7. BMC Health Serv Res. 2017. PMID: 28886740 Free PMC article.
-
A systematic review on current status of health technology reassessment: insights for South Korea.Health Res Policy Syst. 2016 Nov 11;14(1):82. doi: 10.1186/s12961-016-0152-x. Health Res Policy Syst. 2016. PMID: 27835964 Free PMC article.
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources