Failure of protection and enhanced pneumonia with a US H1N2 swine influenza virus in pigs vaccinated with an inactivated classical swine H1N1 vaccine
- PMID: 17719188
- DOI: 10.1016/j.vetmic.2007.07.011
Failure of protection and enhanced pneumonia with a US H1N2 swine influenza virus in pigs vaccinated with an inactivated classical swine H1N1 vaccine
Abstract
Two US swine influenza virus (SIV) isolates, A/Swine/Iowa/15/1930 H1N1 (IA30) and A/Swine/Minnesota/00194/2003 H1N2 (MN03), were evaluated in an in vivo vaccination and challenge model. Inactivated vaccines were prepared from each isolate and used to immunize conventional pigs, followed by challenge with homologous or heterologous virus. Both inactivated vaccines provided complete protection against homologous challenge. However, the IA30 vaccine failed to protect against the heterologous MN03 challenge. Three of the nine pigs in this group had substantially greater percentages of lung lesions, suggesting the vaccine potentiated the pneumonia. In contrast, priming with live IA30 virus provided protection from nasal shedding and virus replication in the lung in MN03 challenged pigs. These data indicate that divergent viruses that did not cross-react serologically did not provide complete cross-protection when used in inactivated vaccines against heterologous challenge and may have enhanced disease. In addition, live virus infection conferred protection against heterologous challenge.
Similar articles
-
Enhanced pneumonia and disease in pigs vaccinated with an inactivated human-like (δ-cluster) H1N2 vaccine and challenged with pandemic 2009 H1N1 influenza virus.Vaccine. 2011 Mar 24;29(15):2712-9. doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2011.01.082. Epub 2011 Feb 23. Vaccine. 2011. PMID: 21310191
-
Genetic relationships, serological cross-reaction and cross-protection between H1N2 and other influenza A virus subtypes endemic in European pigs.Virus Res. 2004 Jul;103(1-2):115-24. doi: 10.1016/j.virusres.2004.02.023. Virus Res. 2004. PMID: 15163499
-
The immune response and maternal antibody interference to a heterologous H1N1 swine influenza virus infection following vaccination.Vet Immunol Immunopathol. 2006 Aug 15;112(3-4):117-28. doi: 10.1016/j.vetimm.2006.02.008. Epub 2006 Apr 18. Vet Immunol Immunopathol. 2006. PMID: 16621020
-
Swine influenza virus vaccines: to change or not to change-that's the question.Curr Top Microbiol Immunol. 2013;370:173-200. doi: 10.1007/82_2012_266. Curr Top Microbiol Immunol. 2013. PMID: 22976350 Review.
-
Mechanisms of broad cross-protection provided by influenza virus infection and their application to vaccines.Jpn J Infect Dis. 2005 Aug;58(4):195-207. Jpn J Infect Dis. 2005. PMID: 16116250 Review.
Cited by
-
Liposomal nanoparticle-based conserved peptide influenza vaccine and monosodium urate crystal adjuvant elicit protective immune response in pigs.Int J Nanomedicine. 2018 Oct 24;13:6699-6715. doi: 10.2147/IJN.S178809. eCollection 2018. Int J Nanomedicine. 2018. PMID: 30425484 Free PMC article.
-
Fc receptors in antibody-dependent enhancement of viral infections.Immunol Rev. 2015 Nov;268(1):340-64. doi: 10.1111/imr.12367. Immunol Rev. 2015. PMID: 26497532 Free PMC article. Review.
-
B Cell Activation and Response Regulation During Viral Infections.Viral Immunol. 2020 May;33(4):294-306. doi: 10.1089/vim.2019.0207. Epub 2020 Apr 23. Viral Immunol. 2020. PMID: 32326852 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Options and obstacles for designing a universal influenza vaccine.Viruses. 2014 Aug 18;6(8):3159-80. doi: 10.3390/v6083159. Viruses. 2014. PMID: 25196381 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Optimal Use of Vaccines for Control of Influenza A Virus in Swine.Vaccines (Basel). 2015 Jan 30;3(1):22-73. doi: 10.3390/vaccines3010022. Vaccines (Basel). 2015. PMID: 26344946 Free PMC article. Review.
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical