Stentless aortic valve reoperations: a surgical challenge
- PMID: 17720369
- DOI: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2007.04.061
Stentless aortic valve reoperations: a surgical challenge
Abstract
Background: Stentless aortic valve reoperations may become more common as these bioprostheses reach the limits of their durability. Relatively few studies have examined stentless valve reoperation, and we therefore reviewed our results for these procedures.
Methods: All patients with stentless valves undergoing redo aortic valve replacement (AVR) at our institution were examined (n = 57). Ten patients had a prior Freestyle valve (Medtronic, Minneapolis, MN), and 47 patients had a Toronto stentless porcine valve (SPV; St. Jude Medical St Paul, MN).
Results: Redo AVR was performed 8.4 +/- 3.7 years (range, 0.1 to 16.5 years) after stentless valve implantation. Reoperations were elective in 27 patients (49%), and 30 (51%) underwent urgent or emergency procedures. The indication for redo AVR was structural valve dysfunction in 48 patients (84%), acute endocarditis in 7 (12%), and other in 2 (4%). Aortic insufficiency was present in 47 patients (82%). A total of 36 aortic root replacement operations (63% of patients) were required, of which 19 were secondary to severe adhesions between the stentless valve and the native aortic root. Operative mortality was 11% (n = 6) for the entire group. Mortality was higher in patients undergoing redo AVR less than 1 year after stentless valve implantation versus more than 1 year (67% versus 7%, p = 0.03). Long-term survival at 5 years postoperatively was 79% +/- 7% in all patients, and 81% of survivors were in New York Heart Association class I or II.
Conclusions: Reoperation after stentless AVR is a challenging procedure that frequently requires aortic root replacement. Stentless valve reoperation is associated with an increased risk of death, particularly in patients operated on within 1 year of implantation.
Similar articles
-
Experience with stentless aortic xenografts.J Heart Valve Dis. 2000 Nov;9(6):794-800. J Heart Valve Dis. 2000. PMID: 11128787
-
[Risk of perioperative mortality and complications following biological aortic valve replacement in elderly patients: stented vs. unstented prostheses].Z Kardiol. 2001;90 Suppl 6:58-64. Z Kardiol. 2001. PMID: 11826823 German.
-
Is routine use of stentless aortic prostheses justified in an elderly (aged > or =75 years) population?J Heart Valve Dis. 2005 Jan;14(1):64-70; discussion 70-1. J Heart Valve Dis. 2005. PMID: 15700438
-
Which patients benefit from stentless aortic valve replacement?Ann Thorac Surg. 2009 Dec;88(6):2061-8. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2009.06.060. Ann Thorac Surg. 2009. PMID: 19932303 Review.
-
In patients with severe active aortic valve endocarditis, is a stentless valve as good as the homograft?Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg. 2010 Sep;11(3):309-13. doi: 10.1510/icvts.2010.234831. Epub 2010 Jun 4. Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg. 2010. PMID: 20525759 Review.
Cited by
-
Prosthetic Heart Valves: More than Half a Century of Innovation-An Overview.J Clin Med. 2025 May 16;14(10):3499. doi: 10.3390/jcm14103499. J Clin Med. 2025. PMID: 40429493 Free PMC article. Review.
-
High-risk Trans-Catheter Aortic Valve Replacement in a Failed Freestyle Valve with Low Coronary Height: A Case Report.Cardiol Ther. 2017 Jun;6(1):145-150. doi: 10.1007/s40119-017-0088-4. Epub 2017 Mar 28. Cardiol Ther. 2017. PMID: 28353137 Free PMC article.
-
Stentless aortic valves. Current aspects.HSR Proc Intensive Care Cardiovasc Anesth. 2012;4(2):77-82. HSR Proc Intensive Care Cardiovasc Anesth. 2012. PMID: 23439732 Free PMC article.
-
Early failure secondary to noncoronary leaflet prolapse in a stentless aortic bioprosthesis.Tex Heart Inst J. 2012;39(5):676-9. Tex Heart Inst J. 2012. PMID: 23109766 Free PMC article.
-
Artificial valves "up to date" in Japan.J Artif Organs. 2010 Jul;13(2):77-87. doi: 10.1007/s10047-010-0507-y. Epub 2010 Jun 17. J Artif Organs. 2010. PMID: 20556626 Review.
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources