Contemporary coronary graft patency: 5-year observational data from a randomized trial of conduits
- PMID: 17720377
- DOI: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2007.04.028
Contemporary coronary graft patency: 5-year observational data from a randomized trial of conduits
Abstract
Background: The Radial Artery Patency and Clinical Outcomes (RAPCO) study has enrolled patients into two trials to compare the radial artery with the free right internal thoracic artery (if age <70 years) or with saphenous vein (if age >70 years) when grafted onto the largest target other than the left anterior descending artery. Patency outcomes in RAPCO will focus only on the trial graft in each case. However, postoperative angiography from this ongoing study has reassessed all coronary grafts, both trial and nontrial: together these offer a valuable observational overview of likely graft patency in the current era in predominately asymptomatic patients, in contrast to symptom-directed studies that may overestimate the incidence of graft failure.
Methods: Protocol-directed percutaneous angiography has been performed at intervals weighted toward the end of the study period, or earlier when directed by symptoms. To date, 184 patients have been studied as per protocol, at time points up to 10 years (mean, 3.9), among whom there are 430 nontrial grafts in addition to the 184 trial grafts. Supplementary angiography (percutaneous or computed tomography) was offered at a fixed 5-year time point postoperatively: at this juncture, 193 trial grafts and 469 nontrial grafts have been imaged. Three masked investigators report grafts as angiographically successful if patent from proximal to distal anastomosis inclusive. Failed grafts include greater than 80% stenosis, string sign, or occlusion.
Results: In staggered protocol-directed angiography, overall patency of the in-situ internal thoracic artery grafts and free arterial grafts was 95.5% (210 of 220) and 91.4%% (150 of 164), respectively, which did not differ significantly (p = 0.13). Saphenous vein graft patency was 83.0% (191 of 230) with a trend to higher failure rate compared with free arterial grafts (p = 0.07), and was significantly lower than that of in-situ internal thoracic artery grafts (p = 0.01). At the optional 5-year time point, outcomes are similar to the protocol-directed findings, with patency of in-situ left and right internal thoracic artery grafts of 95.8% (204 of 213), which was significantly greater than that of the other two groups (p = 0.02 and p < 0.001). Patency of free arterial conduits and saphenous vein grafts was 89.1% (139 of 156) and 82.4% (201 of 244), respectively, which did not differ significantly (p = 0.09) at 5 years.
Conclusions: Although trending to superior patency compared with vein grafts, free arterial conduits have not matched the gold standard achieved by in-situ internal thoracic arteries at trial midpoint. Until the results from RAPCO are available, which will test types of free arterial graft against each other and will compare radial and vein grafts in the longer term, these observational data justify for now our current practice of maximal use of in-situ conduits supplemented by free radial grafts.
Comment in
-
Invited commentary.Ann Thorac Surg. 2007 Sep;84(3):799-800. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2007.04.123. Ann Thorac Surg. 2007. PMID: 17720378 No abstract available.
Similar articles
-
Comparable patencies of the radial artery and right internal thoracic artery or saphenous vein beyond 5 years: results from the Radial Artery Patency and Clinical Outcomes trial.J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2010 Jan;139(1):60-5; discussion 65-7. doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2009.09.043. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2010. PMID: 20106358 Clinical Trial.
-
Which arterial conduit? Radial artery versus free right internal thoracic artery: six-year clinical results of a randomized controlled trial.Ann Thorac Surg. 2007 Aug;84(2):493-7; discussion 497. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2007.03.053. Ann Thorac Surg. 2007. PMID: 17643621 Clinical Trial.
-
Radial artery versus saphenous vein patency randomized trial: five-year angiographic follow-up.Circulation. 2008 Jun 3;117(22):2859-64. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.107.736215. Epub 2008 May 27. Circulation. 2008. PMID: 18506009 Clinical Trial.
-
Radial artery bypass grafts have an increased occurrence of angiographically severe stenosis and occlusion compared with left internal mammary arteries and saphenous vein grafts.Circulation. 2004 May 4;109(17):2086-91. doi: 10.1161/01.CIR.0000127570.20508.5C. Circulation. 2004. PMID: 15123539 Review.
-
The fate of the radial artery conduit in coronary artery bypass grafting surgery.Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2006 Aug;30(2):341-6. doi: 10.1016/j.ejcts.2006.05.012. Epub 2006 Jul 7. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2006. PMID: 16829081 Review.
Cited by
-
Modifiable risk factors remain significant causes of medium term mortality after first time Coronary artery bypass grafting.J Cardiothorac Surg. 2007 Dec 3;2:51. doi: 10.1186/1749-8090-2-51. J Cardiothorac Surg. 2007. PMID: 18053186 Free PMC article.
-
Biomechanics and biocompatibility of the perfect conduit-can we build one?Ann Cardiothorac Surg. 2013 Jul;2(4):435-43. doi: 10.3978/j.issn.2225-319X.2013.05.04. Ann Cardiothorac Surg. 2013. PMID: 23977620 Free PMC article.
-
Hybrid coronary revascularization using limited incisional full sternotomy coronary artery bypass surgery in multivessel disease: early results.Korean J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2014 Apr;47(2):106-10. doi: 10.5090/kjtcs.2014.47.2.106. Epub 2014 Apr 10. Korean J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2014. PMID: 24782958 Free PMC article.
-
Strategies for the coronary surgeon to remain "competitive and co-operative" in the PCI era.Indian Heart J. 2015 Jul-Aug;67(4):351-8. doi: 10.1016/j.ihj.2015.05.002. Epub 2015 Jul 8. Indian Heart J. 2015. PMID: 26304568 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Effectiveness of Saphenous Vein Y-Grafts in Patients Undergoing Off-Pump Complete Myocardial Revascularization.Med Sci Monit. 2019 Jan 21;25:598-604. doi: 10.12659/MSM.911981. Med Sci Monit. 2019. PMID: 30662058 Free PMC article.
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical