Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2007;2(1):13-8.
doi: 10.2147/nano.2007.2.1.13.

Nanomedicines in the treatment of emesis during chemotherapy: focus on aprepitant

Affiliations
Review

Nanomedicines in the treatment of emesis during chemotherapy: focus on aprepitant

Ian Olver et al. Int J Nanomedicine. 2007.

Abstract

Aprepitant, a selective high-affinity antagonist of human substance P/neurokinin 1 (NK1) receptors, is the active ingredient of EMEND which has recently been approved by the FDA for the prevention of chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting (CINV). Aprepitant undergoes extensive metabolism, primarily via CYP3A4 mediated oxidation. It is eliminated primarily by metabolism and is not renally excreted. The apparent terminal half-life in humans ranged from 9 to 13 hours. Early development studies led to the development of a nanoparticle formulation to enhance exposure and minimize food effects. Two large randomized trials accruing 1099 patients studied the effect in patients receiving cisplatin of adding aprepitant to ondansetron and dexamethasone on day 1 then to dexamethasone on days 2 and 3 to control delayed emesis. The complete response of no vomiting and no rescue medication overall from days 1 to 5 improved from 48% to 68% (p<0.001), a 13% improvement in acute emesis but a 21% improvement in delayed emesis with the improvement from 51% to 72% (p<0.001). Similarly, 866 patients treated with cyclophosphamide plus either doxorubicin or epirubicin, received either ondansetron, dexamethasone, and aprepitant on day 1 followed by aprepitant on days 2 and 3 or ondansetron and dexamethasone on day 1 and dexamethasone on days 2 and 3. The overall complete response rate over 5 days was better for the aprepitant group 50.8% vs 42.5% (p=0.015). Complete responses were reported in more patients taking aprepitant in both the acute (76% vs 69%, p=0.034) and delayed (55% vs 49%, p=0.064) phases of vomiting. There were no clinically relevant differences in toxicity by adding aprepitant and improvements in the quality of life of patients on chemotherapy were recorded.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Aprepitant’s active chemical structure.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Aprepitant nanomilling flow schematic.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Aapro M, Schmoll HJ, Poli-Bigelli S, et al. 2005Comparison of aprepitant combination regimen with 4-day ondansetron + 4-day Dexmethasone for prevention of acute and delayed nausea/vomiting after cisplatin chemotherapy [abstract] Proc Am Soc Clin Oncol 23:no. 8007.
    1. Antiemetic Subcommittee of the Multinational Association of supportive care in Cancer (MASCC) Prevention of chemotherapy - and radiotherapy-induced emesis: Results of the Perugia Consensus Conference. Ann Oncol. 1998;9:1022–9. - PubMed
    1. Blum RA, Majumdar A, McCrea J, et al. Effects of aprepitant on the pharmacokinetics of ondansetron and granisetron in healthy subjects. Clin Ther. 2003;25:1407–19. - PubMed
    1. de Boer-Dennert M, de Wit R, Schmitz PI, et al. Patient perceptions of the side-effects of chemotherapy: the influence of 5HT3 antagonists. Br J Cancer. 1997;76:1055–61. - PMC - PubMed
    1. de Jonge ME, Huitema AD, Holtkamp MJ, et al. 2005Aprepitant inhibits cyclophosphamide bioactivation and thiotepa metabolism Cancer Chemother Pharmacol 56370–8.[Epub 2005 Apr]. - PubMed

MeSH terms