Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2007 Sep;133(5):884-906.
doi: 10.1037/0033-2909.133.5.884.

Food reinforcement and eating: a multilevel analysis

Affiliations
Review

Food reinforcement and eating: a multilevel analysis

Leonard H Epstein et al. Psychol Bull. 2007 Sep.

Abstract

Eating represents a choice among many alternative behaviors. The purpose of this review is to provide an overview of how food reinforcement and behavioral choice theory are related to eating and to show how this theoretical approach may help organize research on eating from molecular genetics through treatment and prevention of obesity. Special emphasis is placed on how food reinforcement and behavioral choice theory are relevant to understanding excess energy intake and obesity and how they provide a framework for examining factors that may influence eating and are outside of those that may regulate energy homeostasis. Methods to measure food reinforcement are reviewed, along with factors that influence the reinforcing value of eating. Contributions of neuroscience and genetics to the study of food reinforcement are illustrated by using the example of dopamine. Implications of food reinforcement for obesity and positive energy balance are explored, with suggestions for novel approaches to obesity treatment based on the synthesis of behavioral and pharmacological approaches to food reinforcement.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Hypothetical demand curve for food. The Omax represents the maximal amount of responding for food, and the Pmax the behavioral price at which the greatest amount of responding is observed. As the behavioral cost to obtain food increases, responding increases up to an FR 1,000, and the relationship between behavioral cost and consumption is inelastic. After behavioral costs of FR 1,000 or greater, response rate decreases, and the relationship is elastic. The reduction in responding may be due to a combination of reinforcer satiation and the behavioral cost of obtaining the food. Adapted from a figure describing demand curves for drug reinforcers by Bickel and colleagues (Bickel et al., 2000).
Figure 2
Figure 2
Hypothetical examples of youths who substitute healthy foods for less healthy foods (left graph) or do not substitute healthy foods for less healthy foods (right graph) when the behavioral cost of obtaining the less healthy food is increased.

References

    1. Ackerman SH, Albert M, Shindledecker RD, Gayle C, Smith GP. Intake of different concentrations of sucrose and corn oil in preweanling rats. American Journal of Physiology. 1992;262:R624–627. - PubMed
    1. Ackroff K, Vigorito M, Sclafani A. Fat appetite in rats: The response of infant and adult rats to nutritive and non-nutritive oil emulsions. Appetite. 1990;15:171–188. - PubMed
    1. Ahima RS, Osei SY. Molecular regulation of eating behavior: New insights and prospects for therapeutic strategies. Trends in Molecular Medicine. 2001;7:205–213. - PubMed
    1. Anderson JW, Greenway FL, Fujioka K, Gadde KM, McKenney J, O’Neil PM. Bupropion SR enhances weight loss: A 48-week double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. Obesity Research. 2002;10:633–641. - PubMed
    1. Ator NA, Griffiths RR. Principles of drug abuse liability assessment in laboratory animals. Drug and Alcohol Dependence. 2003;70:S55–72. - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms