Biomarkers for diet and cancer prevention research: potentials and challenges
- PMID: 17723162
- DOI: 10.1111/j.1745-7254.2007.00678.x
Biomarkers for diet and cancer prevention research: potentials and challenges
Abstract
As cancer incidence is projected to increase for decades there is a need for effective preventive strategies. Fortunately, evidence continues to mount that altering dietary habits is an effective and cost-efficient approach for reducing cancer risk and for modifying the biological behavior of tumors. Predictive, validated and sensitive biomarkers, including those that reliably evaluate "intake" or exposure to a specific food or bioactive component, that assess one or more specific biological "effects" that are linked to cancer, and that effectively predict individual "susceptibility" as a function of nutrient-nutrient interactions and genetics, are fundamental to evaluating who will benefit most from dietary interventions. These biomarkers must be readily accessible, easily and reliably assayed, and predictive of a key process(es) involved in cancer. The response to a food is determined not only by the effective concentration of the bioactive food component(s) reaching the target tissue, but also by the amount of the target requiring modification. Thus, this threshold response to foods and their components will vary from individual to individual. The key to understanding a personalized response is a greater knowledge of nutrigenomics, proteomics and metabolomics.
Similar articles
-
Diet and cancer: facts and controversies.Nutr Cancer. 2006;56(2):216-24. doi: 10.1207/s15327914nc5602_13. Nutr Cancer. 2006. PMID: 17474868 Review.
-
Evidence for the relationship between diet and cancer.Exp Oncol. 2010 Sep;32(3):137-42. Exp Oncol. 2010. PMID: 21403607 Review.
-
Nutritional interactions: credentialing of molecular targets for cancer prevention.Exp Biol Med (Maywood). 2007 Feb;232(2):176-83. Exp Biol Med (Maywood). 2007. PMID: 17259324 Review.
-
Frontiers in nutrigenomics, proteomics, metabolomics and cancer prevention.Mutat Res. 2004 Jul 13;551(1-2):51-64. doi: 10.1016/j.mrfmmm.2004.01.012. Mutat Res. 2004. PMID: 15225581 Review.
-
PASSCLAIM--diet-related cancer.Eur J Nutr. 2004 Jun;43 Suppl 2:II47-II84. doi: 10.1007/s00394-004-1203-6. Eur J Nutr. 2004. PMID: 15221354 Review.
Cited by
-
Role of Macronutrients and Micronutrients in DNA Damage: Results From a Food Frequency Questionnaire.Nutr Metab Insights. 2017 Feb 16;10:1178638816684666. doi: 10.1177/1178638816684666. eCollection 2017. Nutr Metab Insights. 2017. PMID: 28469462 Free PMC article.
-
Iron behaving badly: inappropriate iron chelation as a major contributor to the aetiology of vascular and other progressive inflammatory and degenerative diseases.BMC Med Genomics. 2009 Jan 8;2:2. doi: 10.1186/1755-8794-2-2. BMC Med Genomics. 2009. PMID: 19133145 Free PMC article.
-
Molecular and Cellular Mechanisms of Propolis and Its Polyphenolic Compounds against Cancer.Int J Mol Sci. 2022 Sep 9;23(18):10479. doi: 10.3390/ijms231810479. Int J Mol Sci. 2022. PMID: 36142391 Free PMC article. Review.
-
The use of genotoxicity biomarkers in molecular epidemiology: applications in environmental, occupational and dietary studies.AIMS Genet. 2017 Aug 11;4(3):166-191. doi: 10.3934/genet.2017.3.166. eCollection 2017. AIMS Genet. 2017. PMID: 31435507 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Contamination of deconjugation enzymes derived from Helix pomatia with the plant bioactive compounds 3,3'-diindolylmethane, 5-methoxypsoralen, and 8-methoxypsoralen.Food Chem Toxicol. 2013 Dec;62:188-93. doi: 10.1016/j.fct.2013.08.055. Epub 2013 Aug 30. Food Chem Toxicol. 2013. PMID: 23994708 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Research Materials