Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2007 Jul;88(1):87-102.
doi: 10.1901/jeab.2007.36-04.

Contextual control by function and form of transfer of functions

Affiliations

Contextual control by function and form of transfer of functions

David R Perkins et al. J Exp Anal Behav. 2007 Jul.

Abstract

This study investigated conditions leading to contextual control by stimulus topography over transfer of functions. Three 4-member stimulus equivalence classes, each consisting of four (A, B, C, D) topographically distinct visual stimuli, were established for 5 college students. Across classes, designated A stimuli were open-ended linear figures, B stimuli were circular, C stimuli three-sided, and D stimuli four-sided. Three different computer tasks then were trained with the B stimuli. Differential reinforcement and punishment procedures were then used to establish control over function transfer by the topography of the class members. For Task 1, function transfer, responding to C and D stimuli as subjects had to B stimuli, was reinforced. For Task 2, function transfer was reinforced for C stimuli but punished for D stimuli. For Task 3, function transfer was punished for both C and D stimuli. New equivalence classes were then established and tests for generalized contextual control were presented. All 5 subjects showed generalized contextual control of transfer of functions by stimulus topography. Implications of contextual control over function transfer in natural settings are discussed.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Fig 1
Fig 1. Examples of stimuli and experimenter-defined functions.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Barnes D, Healy O, Hayes S.C. Relational frame theory and the relational evaluation procedure: Approaching human language as derived relational responding. In: Leslie J.C, Blackman D, editors. Experimental and applied analysis of human behavior. Reno, NV: Context Press; 2000. pp. 149–180.
    1. Bloomekatz A. Becoming symbol-minded. APS Observer. 2005;18:19.
    1. de Rose J.C, McIlvane W.J, Dube W.V, Galpin V.C, Stoddard L.T. Emergent simple discrimination established by indirect relation to differential consequences. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior. 1988;50:1–20. - PMC - PubMed
    1. DeLoache J.S. Becoming symbol-minded. Trends in Cognitive Sciences. 2004;8:66–70. - PubMed
    1. DeLoache J.S, Pierroutsakos S.L, Uttal D.H. The origins of pictorial competence. Current Directions in Psychological Science. 2003;12:114–118.

LinkOut - more resources