Preliminary experience comparing routine cytology results with the composite results of digital image analysis and fluorescence in situ hybridization in patients undergoing EUS-guided FNA
- PMID: 17725938
- DOI: 10.1016/j.gie.2007.03.1053
Preliminary experience comparing routine cytology results with the composite results of digital image analysis and fluorescence in situ hybridization in patients undergoing EUS-guided FNA
Abstract
Background: Studies indicate enhanced diagnostic accuracy for digital image analysis (DIA) and fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) versus routine cytology examination (RC) when biliary strictures are evaluated. These tumor markers have not been applied to EUS-guided FNA.
Objective: Our purpose was to determine the accuracy of RC versus the composite results of DIA/FISH.
Design: Patients enrolled with known or suspected malignancy. The final diagnosis was based on strict cytopathologic and imaging criteria and 12-month follow-up.
Settings: Tertiary referral center.
Patients: A total of 39 patients were enrolled in whom each diagnostic test was performed on samples from 42 sites to evaluate lymphadenopathy (n=19), pancreatic mass (n=19), esophageal or gastric wall mass (n=3), and thyroid mass (n=1).
Interventions: EUS-guided FNA with RC, DIA, and FISH.
Main outcome measurement: Diagnostic accuracy of RC, DIA, and FISH.
Results: Malignancy was diagnosed in 30 of 42 patients, including esophageal squamous cell carcinoma, esophageal adenocarcinoma, gastric adenocarcinoma, pancreatic adenocarcinoma, pancreatic mucinous cystic neoplasia, intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasia, metastatic forearm sarcoma, small cell and non-small cell lung cancer, thyroid carcinoma, malignant GI stromal tumor, melanoma, adenocarcinoma of unknown primary, and lymphoma. The sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of DIA/FISH versus RC for detecting malignancy were 97%, 100%, and 98% versus 87%, 100%, and 90%, respectively.
Limitations: Single-center pilot study.
Conclusions: Our findings suggest that DIA and FISH processing of EUS-guided FNA specimens provides higher diagnostic accuracy than RC does. These data suggest that these tumor markers incorporate generic targets as suggested by the high diagnostic sensitivity in this patient cohort with diverse pathologic conditions.
Similar articles
-
Advantage of EUS Trucut biopsy combined with fine-needle aspiration without immediate on-site cytopathologic examination.Gastrointest Endosc. 2006 Oct;64(4):505-11. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2006.02.056. Epub 2006 Jun 6. Gastrointest Endosc. 2006. PMID: 16996340
-
EUS-FNA with rescue fluorescence in situ hybridization for the diagnosis of pancreatic carcinoma in patients with inconclusive on-site cytopathology results.Gastrointest Endosc. 2011 Sep;74(3):541-7. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2011.04.043. Epub 2011 Jul 12. Gastrointest Endosc. 2011. PMID: 21752364
-
Comparison of methods to detect neoplasia in patients undergoing endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration.Gastroenterology. 2012 May;142(5):1112-1121.e2. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2012.02.002. Epub 2012 Feb 7. Gastroenterology. 2012. PMID: 22326996
-
Pretherapeutic evaluation of patients with upper gastrointestinal tract cancer using endoscopic and laparoscopic ultrasonography.Dan Med J. 2012 Dec;59(12):B4568. Dan Med J. 2012. PMID: 23290296 Review.
-
Staging of esophageal carcinoma: endoscopic ultrasonography.Rays. 2005 Oct-Dec;30(4):357-62. Rays. 2005. PMID: 16792014 Review.
Cited by
-
Detection of IGF2BP3, HOXB7, and NEK2 mRNA expression in brush cytology specimens as a new diagnostic tool in patients with biliary strictures.PLoS One. 2012;7(8):e42141. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0042141. Epub 2012 Aug 7. PLoS One. 2012. PMID: 22879911 Free PMC article.
-
Imaging modalities for characterising focal pancreatic lesions.Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Apr 17;4(4):CD010213. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD010213.pub2. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017. PMID: 28415140 Free PMC article.
-
Refined pancreatobiliary UroVysion criteria and an approach for further optimization.Cancer Med. 2021 Sep;10(17):5725-5738. doi: 10.1002/cam4.4043. Epub 2021 Aug 10. Cancer Med. 2021. PMID: 34374212 Free PMC article.
-
A prospective comparison of conventional cytology and digital image analysis for the identification of pancreatic malignancy in patients undergoing EUS-FNA.Endosc Ultrasound. 2019 Jul-Aug;8(4):269-276. doi: 10.4103/eus.eus_9_19. Endosc Ultrasound. 2019. PMID: 31115388 Free PMC article.
-
Comparison of FNA-based conventional cytology specimens and digital image analysis in assessment of pancreatic lesions.Cytojournal. 2023 Oct 9;20:39. doi: 10.25259/Cytojournal_61_2022. eCollection 2023. Cytojournal. 2023. PMID: 37942305 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical