Scientific societies and promotion of the responsible conduct of research: codes, policies, and education
- PMID: 17726393
- DOI: 10.1097/ACM.0b013e31812f7e58
Scientific societies and promotion of the responsible conduct of research: codes, policies, and education
Abstract
Scientific societies have a significant opportunity to contribute to the promotion of responsible conduct of research (RCR) and to RCR education. The degree to which societies engage such opportunity spans a broad range. There are three principal ways RCR may be promoted by scientific societies. The first is through codes of conduct encouraging their membership to practice ethical research according to the tenets of these codes. The second is through specialized policies (e.g., publication practices) developed by scientific societies that help define normative behavior. Finally, societies have a role to play in creating materials and resources aimed at educating scientists and trainees in matters pertaining to proper research conduct. This article illustrates examples of each of these activities embraced by different scientific societies. The American Society for Microbiology is used as a specific example of a society that has been proactive in each of these three areas. Scientific societies need to recognize the impact they can have on promoting RCR and to expand their efforts in these three and other relevant areas. The examples provided demonstrate the components of a model for all scientific societies to follow in promoting RCR.
Similar articles
-
Responding to challenges in educating for the responsible conduct of research.Acad Med. 2007 Sep;82(9):870-5. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0b013e31812f77fe. Acad Med. 2007. PMID: 17726394
-
Reported goals for responsible conduct of research courses.Acad Med. 2007 Sep;82(9):846-52. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0b013e31812f78bf. Acad Med. 2007. PMID: 17726389
-
Expanding responsible conduct of research instruction across the university.Acad Med. 2007 Sep;82(9):876-8. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0b013e31812f7909. Acad Med. 2007. PMID: 17726396
-
The role of the AADR in promoting research integrity: perspectives and consensus statements.J Dent Res. 1996 Feb;75(2):856-60. doi: 10.1177/00220345960750022001. J Dent Res. 1996. PMID: 8655787 Review. No abstract available.
-
Codes of ethics (conduct).Occup Med. 2002 Oct-Dec;17(4):559-85. Occup Med. 2002. PMID: 12225927 Review.
Cited by
-
Authorship Issues and Conflict in the U.S. Academic Chemical Community.Account Res. 2015;22(6):346-83. doi: 10.1080/08989621.2015.1047707. Account Res. 2015. PMID: 26155731 Free PMC article.
-
The Role of Culture and Acculturation in Researchers' Perceptions of Rules in Science.Sci Eng Ethics. 2018 Apr;24(2):361-391. doi: 10.1007/s11948-017-9876-4. Epub 2017 Mar 20. Sci Eng Ethics. 2018. PMID: 28321685 Free PMC article.
-
Factors that Affect Integrity of Authorship of Scientific Meeting Abstracts.AJOB Prim Res. 2013;4(2):15-22. doi: 10.1080/21507716.2012.757259. AJOB Prim Res. 2013. PMID: 23776751 Free PMC article.
-
Should We All be Scientists? Re-thinking Laboratory Research as a Calling.Sci Eng Ethics. 2018 Aug;24(4):1161-1179. doi: 10.1007/s11948-017-9940-0. Epub 2017 Jul 19. Sci Eng Ethics. 2018. PMID: 28726028 Free PMC article.
-
Teaching and Assessing the Responsible Conduct of Research: A Delphi Consensus Panel Report.J Res Adm. 2009 Fall;40(1):49-70. J Res Adm. 2009. PMID: 22500145 Free PMC article.
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources