A randomized clinical trial of oral transmucosal fentanyl citrate versus intravenous morphine sulfate for initial control of pain in children with extremity injuries
- PMID: 17726413
- DOI: 10.1097/PEC.0b013e318128f80b
A randomized clinical trial of oral transmucosal fentanyl citrate versus intravenous morphine sulfate for initial control of pain in children with extremity injuries
Abstract
Background: Extremity injury is a common condition that requires pain management in an emergency department. In pediatric patients, the most frequently used method of pain control is intravenous (IV) morphine sulfate. Oral transmucosal fentanyl citrate (OTFC) is a potential alternative to morphine, which may obviate the need to place an IV before addressing pain.
Objective: To compare OTFC with IV morphine for sedation and analgesia during initial evaluation of children with deformity of an extremity and suspected fracture.
Design/methods: A randomized controlled trial of OTFC versus IV morphine in which 8- to 18-year-olds presenting to pediatric tertiary care emergency department with extremity deformity and suspected fracture were eligible. Only those with visual analog scale (VAS) (0 = no pain, 100 = worst pain imaginable) score equal to or greater than 50/100, and American Society of Anesthesia I or II qualified. Patients were excluded if history of loss of/altered level of consciousness, multiple traumatic injuries, or if patient had received prior medication for pain control. All patients enrolled were randomly assigned to receive either IV morphine (0.1 mg/kg) or OTFC (10-15 mug/kg). Patients rated pain intensity using VAS; scores were recorded before medicating and at 15-minute intervals after the medication was given. Adverse events such as emesis, pruritus, and respiratory depression were recorded.
Results: A total of 87 patients were enrolled in study (OTFC, 47; morphine, 40). There are no significant differences between the 2 groups when comparing sex, age, weight, and pretreatment VAS score (P > 0.05). Although the VAS scores were not significantly different before medicating the patient, an analysis of variance shows that there was a significant difference (P > 0.05) in VAS scores at 30 minutes. The differences persisted for every 15 minutes through the 75 minutes of monitoring. There was no statistically significant difference between the 2 groups when comparing the number of adverse events (P = 0.23).
Conclusions: The use of OTFC can provide improved pain control when compared with IV morphine. The pain reduction starts 30 minutes after initiation of medication, and the effect is seen as far as 75 minutes after the initiation of analgesic medication. The study size was too small to make any statements concerning adverse effects; thus, further studies with larger sample sizes are needed to determine the use of OTFC.
Similar articles
-
Oral versus intravenous opioid dosing for the initial treatment of acute musculoskeletal pain in the emergency department.Acad Emerg Med. 2008 Dec;15(12):1234-40. doi: 10.1111/j.1553-2712.2008.00266.x. Epub 2008 Oct 17. Acad Emerg Med. 2008. PMID: 18945240 Clinical Trial.
-
A randomized controlled trial comparing intranasal fentanyl to intravenous morphine for managing acute pain in children in the emergency department.Ann Emerg Med. 2007 Mar;49(3):335-40. doi: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2006.06.016. Epub 2006 Oct 25. Ann Emerg Med. 2007. PMID: 17067720 Clinical Trial.
-
A randomized controlled trial comparing a fascia iliaca compartment nerve block to a traditional systemic analgesic for femur fractures in a pediatric emergency department.Ann Emerg Med. 2007 Aug;50(2):162-71, 171.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2006.09.006. Epub 2007 Jan 8. Ann Emerg Med. 2007. PMID: 17210208 Clinical Trial.
-
Opioids and the management of chronic severe pain in the elderly: consensus statement of an International Expert Panel with focus on the six clinically most often used World Health Organization Step III opioids (buprenorphine, fentanyl, hydromorphone, methadone, morphine, oxycodone).Pain Pract. 2008 Jul-Aug;8(4):287-313. doi: 10.1111/j.1533-2500.2008.00204.x. Epub 2008 May 23. Pain Pract. 2008. PMID: 18503626
-
Oral transmucosal fentanyl citrate for cancer breakthrough pain: a review.Oncol Nurs Forum. 2006 Nov 3;33(2):257-64. doi: 10.1188/06.ONF.257-264. Oncol Nurs Forum. 2006. PMID: 16518441 Review.
Cited by
-
Improving ambulance care for children suffering acute pain: a qualitative interview study.BMC Emerg Med. 2022 Jun 3;22(1):96. doi: 10.1186/s12873-022-00648-y. BMC Emerg Med. 2022. PMID: 35659188 Free PMC article.
-
Pharmacologic Management of Acute Pain in Children: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis.JAMA Pediatr. 2025 Apr 1;179(4):407-417. doi: 10.1001/jamapediatrics.2024.5920. JAMA Pediatr. 2025. PMID: 39899301
-
The treatment of upper limb fractures in children and adolescents.Dtsch Arztebl Int. 2010 Dec;107(51-52):903-10. doi: 10.3238/arztebl.2010.0903. Epub 2010 Dec 27. Dtsch Arztebl Int. 2010. PMID: 21249137 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Pain Management of Pediatric Musculoskeletal Injury in the Emergency Department: A Systematic Review.Pain Res Manag. 2016;2016:4809394. doi: 10.1155/2016/4809394. Epub 2016 Apr 11. Pain Res Manag. 2016. PMID: 27445614 Free PMC article.
-
[Cancer breakthrough pain. Indications for rapidly effective opioids].Anaesthesist. 2011 Jul;60(7):674-82. doi: 10.1007/s00101-011-1868-1. Anaesthesist. 2011. PMID: 21491140 Review. German.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical