Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comparative Study
. 2008 Mar;19(3):357-60.
doi: 10.1007/s00192-007-0440-7. Epub 2007 Aug 29.

Transvaginal vs transobturator approach for synthetic sling placement in patients with stress urinary incontinence

Affiliations
Comparative Study

Transvaginal vs transobturator approach for synthetic sling placement in patients with stress urinary incontinence

S Charalambous et al. Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct. 2008 Mar.

Abstract

We present comparative short-term experience with the transvaginal (TVT) and the transobturator (TVT-O) approaches for the treatment of stress urinary incontinence (SUI). We studied 315 women with SUI, treated with a tension-free tape placement. The TVT approach was applied in 265 women, while 50 women were treated by the TVT-O approach. The mean operation time was 25 and 17 min in the TVT and TVT-O group, respectively (p<0.001). In the TVT group, continence rates were 87% after 1 year, while in the TVT-O group, the continence rate was 94%. Postoperative pain was reported in 14.4 and 28% of the TVT and TVT-O patients, respectively (p=0.02). Complications such as bladder perforation, retropubic hematoma, and urinary retention took place only in the TVT group. Urinary tract infections were recorded in 20 and 8% of the TVT and TVT-O patients, respectively (p=0.04), while vaginal erosion took place in 1.5 and 2% and de novo urgency in 14 and 8%. Both approaches show high rates of cure at the first postoperative year, while complications are less with the TVT-O procedure.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Eur Urol. 2005 Jan;47(1):102-6; discussion 106-7 - PubMed
    1. Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct. 2004 Nov-Dec;15(6):432-3 - PubMed
    1. J Urol. 2006 Mar;175(3 Pt 1):1014-7 - PubMed
    1. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2004 Mar;190(3):602-8 - PubMed
    1. J Urol. 2003 Jun;169(6):2242-3 - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources