Procalcitonin versus C-reactive protein for predicting pneumonia in adults with lower respiratory tract infection in primary care
- PMID: 17727748
- PMCID: PMC2099638
Procalcitonin versus C-reactive protein for predicting pneumonia in adults with lower respiratory tract infection in primary care
Abstract
Background: The role of procalcitonin in diagnosing bacterial infection has mainly been studied in patients with severe infections. There is no study on the value of procalcitonin measurements in adults with lower respiratory tract infection (LRTI) treated in primary care.
Aim: To evaluate the accuracy of plasma procalcitonin in predicting radiographic pneumonia, bacterial infection, and adverse outcome in a population of adults with LRTI treated in primary care.
Design of study: Prospective, observational study.
Setting: Forty-two general practices and an outpatient clinic at the Department of Infectious Diseases, Odense University Hospital, Denmark.
Method: A total of 364 patients with LRTI were prospectively enrolled from 42 general practices. Patients were examined with chest radiography, microbiological analyses, and measurements of C-reactive protein (CRP) and procalcitonin. The outcome measure was hospitalisation within 4 weeks of enrollment.
Results: Median procalcitonin was 0.05 ng/ml, which was below the functional sensitivity of the assay (0.06 ng/ml). In predicting radiographic pneumonia, bacterial infection, and hospitalisation, the sensitivities of procalcitonin >0.06 ng/ml were 0.70, 0.51, and 0.67, and of CRP were > or =20 mg/l, 0.73, 0.56, and 0.74 respectively. Corresponding positive predictive values were between 0.09 and 0.28.
Conclusion: Both procalcitonin >0.06 ng/ml and CRP > or =20 mg/l were associated with radiographic pneumonia, bacterial infection, and subsequent hospitalisation, but positive predictive values were too low for any of the two inflammatory markers to be of use in clinical practice. To measure procalcitonin values accurately in the primary care setting, a more sensitive method is needed, but there was no indication that procalcitonin is superior to CRP in identifying patients with pneumonia, bacterial aetiology, or adverse outcome.
Figures
Comment in
-
Diagnostic testing: the importance of context.Br J Gen Pract. 2007 Aug;57(541):678-9. Br J Gen Pract. 2007. PMID: 17688774 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
References
-
- Raherison C, Peray P, Poirier R, et al. Management of lower respiratory tract infections by French general practitioners: the AIR II study. Analyse Infections Respiratoires. Eur Respir J. 2002;19(2):314–319. - PubMed
-
- Huchon GJ, Gialdroni-Grassi G, Leophonte P, et al. Initial antibiotic therapy for lower respiratory tract infection in the community: a European survey. Eur Respir J. 1996;9(8):1590–1595. - PubMed
-
- Metlay JP, Kapoor WN, Fine MJ. Does this patient have community-acquired pneumonia? Diagnosing pneumonia by history and physical examination. JAMA. 1997;278(17):1440–1445. - PubMed
-
- Plouffe JF, McNally C, File TM., Jr Value of noninvasive studies in community-acquired pneumonia. Infect Dis Clin North Am. 1998;12(3):689–699. ix. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical
Research Materials
Miscellaneous