Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2007 Aug;22(4):706-12.
doi: 10.3346/jkms.2007.22.4.706.

Laparoscopic myomectomy for large myomas

Affiliations

Laparoscopic myomectomy for large myomas

Hyo Jin Yoon et al. J Korean Med Sci. 2007 Aug.

Abstract

The aim of this study was to assess the feasibility and efficacy of laparoscopic myomectomy (LM) for large myomas. A subpopulation of 51 patients with myomas 8 cm or larger in diameter was selected from 155 patients who underwent LM at Kangbuk Samsung Hospital from July 2003 to November 2006. The mean age of the patients was 34.9 +/- 5.6 yr, mean parity was 0.6 +/- 0.9, and 8 patients had a previous operative history. The most common operative indication was a palpable abdominal mass (24 patients, 47%). The mean operating time was 85.6 +/- 38.9 min, and the mean diameter of the largest myoma was 9.3 +/- 1.8 cm. The mean change in hemoglobin concentration was 2.1 +/- 1.2 g/dL. Histopathological diagnosis included 49 patients of leiomyoma (96.1%) and 2 patients of leiomyoma with adenomyosis (3.9%). Postoperatively, a transfusion was done in 7 patients, and a case of subcutaneous emphysema was noted. None of the operations was switched to laparotomy. With the newly-developed screw and the port placement system that was modified from the Choi's 4-trocar method to obtain better surgical vision, LM of large myomas proved to be one of the efficient and feasible methods.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
(A) Port placement system of laparoscopic myomectomy for large myomas. (B) New metallic screw.
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
(A) Intramural myoma of 9 cm in diameter on the posterior uterine wall on ultrasonography. (B) An image of a new metallic screw fixed to the myoma after peeling off the capsule of the myoma. (C) An image of the uterus after laparoscopic myomectomy.
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Comparison between this study and the previous studies in myoma size (A), operating time (B), hemoglobin change (C), and ratio with complication (D).

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Hurst BS, Matthews ML, Marshburn PB. Laparoscopic myomectomy for symptomatic uterine myomas. Fertil Steril. 2005;83:1–23. - PubMed
    1. Alessandri F, Lijoi D, Mistrangelo E, Ferrero S, Ragni N. Randomized study of laparoscopic versus minilaparotomic myomectomy for uterine myomas. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2006;13:92–97. - PubMed
    1. Sinha R, Hegde A, Warty N, Patil N. Laparoscopic excision of very large myomas. J Am Assoc Gynecol Laparosc. 2003;10:461–468. - PubMed
    1. Marret H, Chevillot M, Giraudeau B. Factors influencing laparoconversions during the learning curve of laparoscopic myomectomy. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2006;85:324–329. - PubMed
    1. Marret H, Chevillot M, Giraudeau B. A retrospective multicentre study comparing myomectomy by laparoscopy and laparotomy in current surgical practice. What are the best patient selection criteria? Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2004;117:82–86. - PubMed