Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2007 Sep;57(542):737-40.

Measuring patient satisfaction for the Quality and Outcomes Framework

Affiliations
Review

Measuring patient satisfaction for the Quality and Outcomes Framework

Matthew Hankins et al. Br J Gen Pract. 2007 Sep.

Abstract

The general medical services (GMS) contract Quality and Outcomes Framework (QOF) awards up to 70 points for measuring patient satisfaction with either the Improving Practices Questionnaire (IPQ) or the General Practice Assessment Questionnaire (GPAQ). The usefulness of data collected depends crucially on the validity and reliability of the measurement instrument. The literature was reviewed to assess the validity and reliability of these questionnaires. The literature was searched for peer-review publications that assessed the reliability and validity of the IPQ and GPAQ, using online literature databases and hand-searching of references up to June 2006. One paper claimed to assess the validity and reliability of the IPQ. No paper reported the reliability and validity of the GPAQ, but three papers assessed an earlier version (the GPAS). No published evidence could be found that the IPQ, GPAQ, or GPAS have been validated against external criteria. The GPAS was found to have acceptable reliability and test-retest reliability. Neither of the instruments mandated by the GMS contract has been formally assessed for reliability: their reproducibility remains unknown. The validation of the two questionnaires approved by the QOF to assess patient satisfaction with general practice appears to be suboptimal. It is recommended that future patient experience surveys are piloted for validity and reliability before being implemented widely.

PubMed Disclaimer

Comment in

References

    1. British Medical Association/The NHS Confederation. The new GMS contract. London: British Medical Association and NHS Confederation; 2003.
    1. Greco M, Powell R, Sweeney K. The Improving Practice Questionnaire (IPQ): a practical tool for general practices seeking patient views. Educ Prim Care. 2003;14:440–448.
    1. National Primary Care Research and Development Centre. General Practice Assessment Questionnaire (GPAQ) Manchester: National Primary Care Research and Development Centre, Manchester University;
    1. Ross CK, Steward CA, Sinacore JM. A comparative study of seven measures of patient satisfaction. Med Care. 1995;33:392–406. - PubMed
    1. Hays RD, Ware JE. My medical care is better than yours: social desirability and patient satisfaction ratings. Med Care. 1986;24:519–525. - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources