Effectiveness of phase I orthodontic treatment in an undergraduate teaching clinic
- PMID: 17761624
Effectiveness of phase I orthodontic treatment in an undergraduate teaching clinic
Abstract
In this retrospective study, the Peer Assessment Rating (PAR) index was used to objectively evaluate the effectiveness of Phase I (early) orthodontic treatment provided in an undergraduate teaching clinic. Pre-treatment and post-treatment casts of ninety-three patients were analyzed. All patients selected for Phase I orthodontic treatment had Class I skeletal relationships and did not require complex orthodontic treatment such as growth modification or treatment of occlusions with missing or impacted teeth. The mean age of patients who received Phase I orthodontic treatment was 9.9 years. The mean initial PAR score for the sample was 29.70 +/-9.84. The mean reduction in PAR score was 14.9 points corresponding to a 50.2 percent decrease in the PAR score following Phase I orthodontic treatment. Seventy-three percent of the patients experienced at least a 30 percent reduction in their PAR score following Phase I (early) orthodontic treatment. The mean cost of $381.00 for the Phase I orthodontic treatment was found to be influenced by the length of treatment, type of Phase I treatment provided, age at start of treatment, and percentage reduction in PAR score. The greatest success rate for the Phase I orthodontic treatment occurred with either fixed or a combination of fixed and removable appliances. Over half of the patients recommended for Phase I orthodontic treatment in the undergraduate dental clinic were successfully treated and did not require Phase II treatment. For them, there was both a treatment and a financial benefit to the Phase I orthodontic treatment.
Similar articles
-
[Efficacy of orthodontic treatment according to the Peer Assessment Rating index].Ann Acad Med Stetin. 2003;49:335-51. Ann Acad Med Stetin. 2003. PMID: 15552857 Polish.
-
Treatment results in dental school orthodontic patients in 1983 and 1993.Angle Orthod. 1999 Feb;69(1):19-26. doi: 10.1043/0003-3219(1999)069<0019:TRIDSO>2.3.CO;2. Angle Orthod. 1999. PMID: 10022180
-
Comparisons of similar patients treated by general dental clinicians and orthodontic specialists. Outcome and economical considerations.Swed Dent J. 2009;33(2):67-73. Swed Dent J. 2009. PMID: 19728578
-
[Orthodontics in general practice 3. Angle Class II/1 malocclusion: one-phase treatment treatment preferred to two-phase treatment].Ned Tijdschr Tandheelkd. 2008 Jan;115(1):22-8. Ned Tijdschr Tandheelkd. 2008. PMID: 18265733 Review. Dutch.
-
Indications for the use of fixed and removable orthodontic appliances.Dent Update. 1993 Jan-Feb;20(1):25-6, 28-30, 32. Dent Update. 1993. PMID: 8330661 Review.
Cited by
-
Evaluation of treatment outcomes in a 3 years post-graduate orthodontic program using the peer assessment rating (par).J Clin Exp Dent. 2014 Oct 1;6(4):e364-8. doi: 10.4317/jced.51512. eCollection 2014 Oct. J Clin Exp Dent. 2014. PMID: 25593657 Free PMC article.
-
Orthodontic Compliance Assessment: A Systematic Review.Int Dent J. 2022 Oct;72(5):597-606. doi: 10.1016/j.identj.2022.07.004. Epub 2022 Aug 10. Int Dent J. 2022. PMID: 35961844 Free PMC article.
-
Does daily wear time of Twin Block reliably predict its efficiency of class II treatment?J Orofac Orthop. 2022 May;83(3):195-204. doi: 10.1007/s00056-021-00300-7. Epub 2021 May 7. J Orofac Orthop. 2022. PMID: 33961060 Free PMC article.
-
The Use of Microsensors to Assess the Daily Wear Time of Removable Orthodontic Appliances: A Prospective Cohort Study.Sensors (Basel). 2022 Mar 22;22(7):2435. doi: 10.3390/s22072435. Sensors (Basel). 2022. PMID: 35408050 Free PMC article.
-
Orthodontic Treatment and Healthcare Goals: Evaluation of Multibrackets Treatment Results Using PAR Index (Peer Assessment Rating).Healthcare (Basel). 2020 Nov 10;8(4):473. doi: 10.3390/healthcare8040473. Healthcare (Basel). 2020. PMID: 33182796 Free PMC article.
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Medical