Should eponyms be abandoned? Yes
- PMID: 17762033
- PMCID: PMC1962844
- DOI: 10.1136/bmj.39308.342639.AD
Should eponyms be abandoned? Yes
Abstract
Medicine has been enthusiastic in naming tests, symptoms, and diseases after their discoverers. Alexander Woywodt and Eric Matteson argue that eponyms are no longer appropriate, but Judith A Whitworth believes they remain a useful reflection of medical history
Conflict of interest statement
Competing interests: None declared.
Comment in
-
Should eponyms be abandoned? No.BMJ. 2007 Sep 1;335(7617):425. doi: 10.1136/bmj.39308.380567.AD. BMJ. 2007. PMID: 17762034 Free PMC article.
-
Time to drop eponyms: Curbing Medicalese is the issue.BMJ. 2007 Sep 15;335(7619):528. doi: 10.1136/bmj.39332.450995.3A. BMJ. 2007. PMID: 17855293 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
References
-
- Lifton R. The Nazi doctors: medical killing and the psychology of genocide New York.: Basic Books, 1986
-
- Wallace DJ, Weisman MH. The physician Hans Reiter as prisoner of war in Nuremberg: a contextual review of his interrogations (1945-1947). Semin Arthritis Rheum 2003;32:208-30. - PubMed
-
- Lu DW, Katz KA. Declining use of the eponym “Reiter's syndrome” in the medical literature, 1998–2003. J Am Acad Dermatol 2005;53:720-3. - PubMed
-
- Panush RS, Wallace DJ, Dorff RE, Engleman EP. Retraction of the suggestion to use the term “Reiter's syndrome” sixty-five years later: the legacy of Reiter, a war criminal, should not be eponymic honor but rather condemnation. Arthritis Rheum 2007;56:693-4. - PubMed
-
- Woywodt A, Haubitz M, Haller H, Matteson EL. Wegener's granulomatosis. Lancet 2006;367:1362-6. - PubMed
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources